Makro Labelling S.R.L.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B65C (Labelling OR Tagging Machines, Apparatus, OR Processes).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Makro ranks #32,416 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 5 technology areas.
- #32,416
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 21st percentile
- by Innovation Score (26.7/100)
- 16.5
- avg claims per patent
- +33%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R32416 · Foreign Corporation #32,416 · 8 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-UP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
- MID-PACK #32,416/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH MAF Agrobotic
- CPC-NARROW B65C · 5 areas
- INNOV-THIN 26.7/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 16.5 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-UP +33% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: MAF Agrobotic (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Makro’s 26.7 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Makro
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Makro Labelling S R L · this assignee 27
Makro Labelling S R L · this assignee
27 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Makro's Innovation Score is 26.7/100 (21st percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Makro?
Each dot is one of Makro’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Makro’s own 16.5 claims/patent is at or below the 17.3 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Makro's grants concentrate
Makro Labelling S.R.L. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under B65C (Labelling OR Tagging Machines, Apparatus, OR Processes). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Makro sits between MAF Agrobotic and Mandus Group LLC.
Makro's three-year grant acceleration
Makro Labelling S.R.L. shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 5 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Makro's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- MAF Agrobotic
MAF Agrobotic
8 patents
- Magforce
Magforce AG
8 patents
- Magna Industries
Magna Industries, Inc.
8 patents
- Make Sence
Make Sence, Inc.
8 patents
- Makusafe
Makusafe Corp.
8 patents
- Mallory Sonalert…
Mallory Sonalert Products, Inc.
8 patents
- Mamas & Papas (Ho…
Mamas & Papas (HOLDINGS) Limited
8 patents
- Mandus Group
Mandus Group LLC
8 patents
- Makro Labelling S… ◀
Makro Labelling S.R.L.
8 patents
What this shows Makro holds 8 patents at rank #32,395, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Makro
By rank, the assignees closest to #32,395 in granted patent volume.
- MAF Agrobotic #32,391 · 8 patents
- Magforce AG #32,392 · 8 patents
- Magna Industries, Inc. #32,393 · 8 patents
- Make Sence, Inc. #32,394 · 8 patents
- Makusafe Corp. #32,396 · 8 patents
- Mallory Sonalert Products, Inc. #32,397 · 8 patents
- Mamas & Papas (HOLDINGS) Limited #32,398 · 8 patents
- Mandus Group LLC #32,399 · 8 patents
Leaders in B65C (Labelling OR Tagging Machines)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Makro's primary technology class.
Makro's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
27 21st percentile higher than 21% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2019 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2020 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2021 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2022 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 12.5% |
Which technologies does Makro Labelling S.R.L. patent most?
Top 5 of 5 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Makro Labelling S.R.L.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Makro Labelling S.R.L.'s lead technology class is B65C (Labelling OR Tagging Machines, Apparatus, OR Processes), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B65C
- Ranked #32,416 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Makro Labelling S.R.L. against MAF Agrobotic, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 26.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.