Where does Magic Pony Technology Limited rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Magic Pony Technology Limited ranks #14,759 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Magic Pony Technology Limited hold?

Magic Pony Technology Limited holds 20 US utility patents granted between 2019 and 2022, spanning 5 technology areas.

What is Magic Pony Technology Limited's Innovation Score?

Magic Pony Technology Limited has an Innovation Score of 31.1 out of 100 (36th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Magic Pony Technology Limited focus on?

Magic Pony Technology Limited's top technology area is G06T (Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General) with 18 patents, ranking #769 of 6,389 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 5 CPC subclasses total.

Is Magic Pony Technology Limited's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Magic Pony Technology Limited's recent grant velocity is +467% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Magic Pony Technology Limited's patents?

Magic Pony Technology Limited's patents average 20.5 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Magic Pony Technology Limited patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Magic Pony Technology Limited

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 20 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2022. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06T (Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Magic ranks #14,759 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 20 patents across 5 technology areas.

#14,759
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 36th percentile
by Innovation Score (31.1/100): 20.5
avg claims per patent: +467%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R14759 · Foreign Corporation #14,759 · 20 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 20 grants
MID-PACK #14,759/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Magnum Oil Tools…
CPC-NARROW G06T · 5 areas
INNOV-THIN 31.1/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 20.5 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-SURGE +467% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Magnum Oil Tools International, Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Magic’s 31.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 10.5 pts (34%) Velocity 0.4 pts (1%) Breadth 7.9 pts (25%) Claim depth 12.3 pts (40%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Magic Pony Technology · this assignee

31
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Magic's Innovation Score is 31.1/100 (36th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Magic?

Each dot is one of Magic’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Magic’s own 20.5 claims/patent is ABOVE the 18.3 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Magic vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Magic's grants concentrate

Magic Pony Technology Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 90% of grants classified under G06T (Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (12 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2022. By volume, Magic sits between Mistubishi Electric Corporation and Marchex, Inc..

Magic's three-year grant acceleration

Magic Pony Technology Limited shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 19 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Mistubishi Electr…

20
Motivo

20
Mubea Carbo Tech

20
Muuto

20
Magnum Oil Tools…

20
Manus Bio

20
Manyworlds

20
Marchex

20
Magic Pony Techno… ◀

20

What this shows Magic holds 20 patents at rank #14,770, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Magic

By rank, the assignees closest to #14,770 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06T (Image Data Processing OR Generation)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Magic's primary technology class.

Magic's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

31 36th percentile higher than 36% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2019–2022

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Magic Pony Technology Limited patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2019	3	15.0%
2020	12	60.0%
2021	4	20.0%
2022	1	5.0%

Which technologies does Magic Pony Technology Limited patent most?

G06T - Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General 18

H04N - Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television 16

G06N - Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models 13

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 11

G06K - Graphical Data Reading ; Presentation OF DATA; Record CARRIERS; Handling Record Carriers 1

Top 5 of 5 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Magic Pony Technology Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Magic Pony Technology Limited's lead technology class is G06T (Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General), 90% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06T
Ranked #14,759 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Magic Pony Technology Limited against Mistubishi Electric Corporation, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 31.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.