USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

M2M and IoT Technologies, LLC

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 12 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2017. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04W (Wireless Communication Networks).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, M2M ranks #22,929 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 12 patents across 6 technology areas.

#22,929
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
36th percentile
by Innovation Score (30.9/100)
22.3
avg claims per patent
-100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R22929 · US Corporation #22,929 · 12 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 12 grants
  • MID-PACK #22,929/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Ludong University
  • CPC-NARROW H04W · 6 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 30.9/100
  • CLAIMS-DENSE 22.3 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DROP -100% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Ludong University (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How M2M’s 30.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around M2M

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows M2M's Innovation Score is 30.9/100 (36th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for M2M?

Each dot is one of M2M’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). M2M’s own 22.3 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.3 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

M2M vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 11.911.91212.1 010203040 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Ludong University - 12, 7.58Ludong UniversityLuminus Devices, Inc. - 12, 13.33Luminus DevicesLundbeck La Jolla Research Center, Inc. - 12, 13.5Lundbeck La Jolla…M.S.T. Medical Surgery Technologies Ltd - 12, 38.17M S T Medical Sur…Manz Italy S.R.L. - 12, 15Manz Italy S R LMaps, Inc. - 12, 7.67MapsMarengo Therapeutics, Inc. - 12, 22.42Marengo Therapeut…Marklogic Corporation - 12, 8.67MarklogicM2M and IoT Technologies, LLC - 12, 22.33M2M and Iot
M2M vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where M2M's grants concentrate

M2M and IoT Technologies, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under H04W (Wireless Communication Networks). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (6 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2015. By volume, M2M sits between Ludong University and Marklogic Corporation.

Who files at M2M's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows M2M holds 12 patents at rank #22,922, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near M2M

By rank, the assignees closest to #22,922 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H04W (Wireless Communication Networks)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in M2M's primary technology class.

M2M's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

31 36th percentile higher than 36% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

1234567 201520162017 4
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2017

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
M2M and IoT Technologies, LLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 2 16.7%
2016 6 50.0%
2017 4 33.3%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

M2M and IoT Technologies, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • M2M and IoT Technologies, LLC's lead technology class is H04W (Wireless Communication Networks), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04W
  • Ranked #22,929 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare M2M and IoT Technologies, LLC against Ludong University, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 30.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.