Lynk, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 17 granted patents across 1 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2022. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A47B (TABLES; DESKS; Office FURNITURE; CABINETS; DRAWERS; General Details OF Furniture).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Lynk ranks #16,968 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 17 patents across 1 technology areas.
- #16,968
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 15th percentile
- by Innovation Score (24.6/100)
- 1.9
- avg claims per patent
- -58%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R16968 · US Corporation #16,968 · 17 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 17 grants
- MID-PACK #16,968/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Litera
- CPC-NARROW A47B · 1 areas
- INNOV-THIN 24.6/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.9 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -58% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Litera Corporation (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Lynk’s 24.6 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Lynk
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Lynk · this assignee 25
Lynk · this assignee
25 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Lynk's Innovation Score is 24.6/100 (15th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Lynk?
Each dot is one of Lynk’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Lynk’s own 1.9 claims/patent is at or below the 14.5 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Lynk's grants concentrate
Lynk, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 1 CPC subclasses with 5.9% of grants classified under A47B (TABLES; DESKS; Office FURNITURE; CABINETS; DRAWERS; General Details OF Furniture). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (5 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2016. By volume, Lynk sits between Litera Corporation and Madi, LLC.
Lynk's three-year grant acceleration
Lynk, Inc. shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Lynk's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Litera
Litera Corporation
17 patents
- Liveview
LiveView Technologies, LLC
17 patents
- Lumicell
Lumicell, Inc.
17 patents
- Luminiz
Luminiz Inc.
17 patents
- M & C Innovations
M & C Innovations, LLC
17 patents
- M3 Technology
M3 Technology Inc.
17 patents
- Mace Group
Mace Group, Inc.
17 patents
- Madi
Madi, LLC
17 patents
- Lynk ◀
Lynk, Inc.
17 patents
What this shows Lynk holds 17 patents at rank #16,967, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Lynk
By rank, the assignees closest to #16,967 in granted patent volume.
- Litera Corporation #16,963 · 17 patents
- LiveView Technologies, LLC #16,964 · 17 patents
- Lumicell, Inc. #16,965 · 17 patents
- Luminiz Inc. #16,966 · 17 patents
- M & C Innovations, LLC #16,968 · 17 patents
- M3 Technology Inc. #16,969 · 17 patents
- Mace Group, Inc. #16,970 · 17 patents
- Madi, LLC #16,971 · 17 patents
Leaders in A47B (Tables)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Lynk's primary technology class.
Lynk's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
25 15th percentile higher than 15% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 5 | 29.4% |
| 2016 | 2 | 11.8% |
| 2017 | 2 | 11.8% |
| 2018 | 3 | 17.6% |
| 2020 | 2 | 11.8% |
| 2022 | 3 | 17.6% |
Which technologies does Lynk, Inc. patent most?
Top 1 of 1 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Lynk, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Lynk, Inc.'s lead technology class is A47B (TABLES; DESKS; Office FURNITURE; CABINETS; DRAWERS; General Details OF Furniture), 5.9% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A47B
- Ranked #16,968 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Lynk, Inc. against Litera Corporation, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 24.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.