Where does Lucky Brand Industrial Co., Ltd. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Lucky Brand Industrial Co., Ltd. ranks #20,029 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Lucky Brand Industrial Co., Ltd. hold?

Lucky Brand Industrial Co., Ltd. holds 14 US utility patents granted between 2016 and 2025, spanning 2 technology areas.

What is Lucky Brand Industrial Co., Ltd.'s Innovation Score?

Lucky Brand Industrial Co., Ltd. has an Innovation Score of 32.0 out of 100 (40th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Lucky Brand Industrial Co., Ltd. focus on?

Lucky Brand Industrial Co., Ltd.'s top technology area is B25D (Percussive Tools) with 2 patents, ranking #35 of 94 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 2 CPC subclasses total.

Is Lucky Brand Industrial Co., Ltd.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Lucky Brand Industrial Co., Ltd.'s recent grant velocity is +17% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). The company is maintaining or growing its granted-patent output.

What does claim depth mean for Lucky Brand Industrial Co., Ltd.'s patents?

Lucky Brand Industrial Co., Ltd.'s patents average 1.6 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Lucky Brand Industrial Co., Ltd. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Lucky Brand Industrial Co., Ltd.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 14 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B25D (Percussive Tools).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Lucky ranks #20,029 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 14 patents across 2 technology areas.

#20,029
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 40th percentile
by Innovation Score (32.0/100): 1.6
avg claims per patent: +17%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R20029 · Foreign Corporation #20,029 · 14 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-UP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 14 grants
MID-PACK #20,029/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Logue AND PTY AS…
CPC-NARROW B25D · 2 areas
INNOV-THIN 32.0/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.6 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-UP +17% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Logue AND Co. PTY Ltd., AS Trustee FOR A.T. & L.M. Logue Family Trust (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Lucky’s 32.0 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 9.4 pts (29%) Velocity 16.7 pts (52%) Breadth 5.0 pts (16%) Claim depth 1.0 pts (3%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Lucky Brand Industrial · this assignee

32
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Lucky's Innovation Score is 32.0/100 (40th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Lucky?

Each dot is one of Lucky’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Lucky’s own 1.6 claims/patent is at or below the 14.6 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Lucky vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Lucky's grants concentrate

Lucky Brand Industrial Co., Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 14.3% of grants classified under B25D (Percussive Tools). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Lucky sits between Logue AND Co. PTY Ltd., AS Trustee FOR A.T. & L.M. Logue Family Trust and Luxexcel Holding B.V..

Lucky's three-year grant acceleration

Lucky Brand Industrial Co., Ltd. shows 5 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Logue AND PTY AS…

14
Lontra

14
Lonza Biologics

14
LPW Technology

14
Luft Industrie

14
Lumon Invest OY

14
Lunar Helium-3 Mi…

14
Luxexcel Holding…

14
Lucky Brand Indus… ◀

14

What this shows Lucky holds 14 patents at rank #20,012, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Lucky

By rank, the assignees closest to #20,012 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B25D (Percussive Tools)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Lucky's primary technology class.

Lucky's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

32 40th percentile higher than 40% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Lucky Brand Industrial Co., Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2016	1	7.1%
2017	5	35.7%
2020	2	14.3%
2022	1	7.1%
2024	4	28.6%
2025partial year	1	7.1%

Which technologies does Lucky Brand Industrial Co., Ltd. patent most?

B25D - Percussive Tools 2

B25G - Handles FOR Hand Implements 1

Top 2 of 2 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Lucky Brand Industrial Co., Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Lucky Brand Industrial Co., Ltd.'s lead technology class is B25D (Percussive Tools), 14.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B25D
Ranked #20,029 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Lucky Brand Industrial Co., Ltd. against Logue AND Co. PTY Ltd., AS Trustee FOR A.T. & L.M. Logue Family Trust, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 32.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.