L.T. Hampel Corp.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A01K (Animal HUSBANDRY; AVICULTURE; APICULTURE; PISCICULTURE; FISHING; Rearing OR Breeding Animals, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; NEW Breeds OF Animals).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, L.t. ranks #48,458 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 8 technology areas.
- #48,458
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 13th percentile
- by Innovation Score (23.9/100)
- 12.8
- avg claims per patent
- -67%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R48458 · US Corporation #48,458 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #48,458/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Kwikbolt
- CPC-NARROW A01K · 8 areas
- INNOV-THIN 23.9/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 12.8 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -67% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Kwikbolt Limited (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How L.t.’s 23.9 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around L.t.
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- L T Hampel · this assignee 24
L T Hampel · this assignee
24 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows L.t.'s Innovation Score is 23.9/100 (13th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for L.t.?
Each dot is one of L.t.’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). L.t.’s own 12.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 12.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where L.t.'s grants concentrate
L.T. Hampel Corp. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 80% of grants classified under A01K (Animal HUSBANDRY; AVICULTURE; APICULTURE; PISCICULTURE; FISHING; Rearing OR Breeding Animals, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; NEW Breeds OF Animals). By volume, L.t. sits between Kwikbolt Limited and Laboratoire Biodim.
Who files at LT's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Kwikbolt
Kwikbolt Limited
5 patents
- L&M Architectural…
L&M Architectural Graphics, Inc.
5 patents
- L'isolante K-flex…
L'Isolante K-Flex S.p.A.
5 patents
- L-base
L-base Co., Ltd.
5 patents
- L3 Latitude
L3 Latitude, LLC
5 patents
- L3harris Intersta…
L3Harris Interstate Electronics Corporation
5 patents
- Lablabo
Lablabo
5 patents
- Laboratoire Biodim
Laboratoire Biodim
5 patents
- L T Hampel ◀
L.T. Hampel Corp.
5 patents
What this shows L.T. holds 5 patents at rank #48,271, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near LT
By rank, the assignees closest to #48,271 in granted patent volume.
- Kwikbolt Limited #48,267 · 5 patents
- L&M Architectural Graphics, Inc. #48,268 · 5 patents
- L'Isolante K-Flex S.p.A. #48,269 · 5 patents
- L-base Co., Ltd. #48,270 · 5 patents
- L3 Latitude, LLC #48,272 · 5 patents
- L3Harris Interstate Electronics Corporation #48,273 · 5 patents
- Lablabo #48,274 · 5 patents
- Laboratoire Biodim #48,275 · 5 patents
Leaders in A01K (Animal Husbandry)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in LT's primary technology class.
L.t.'s Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
24 13th percentile higher than 13% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2016 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2017 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2020 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 20.0% |
Which technologies does L.T. Hampel Corp. patent most?
Top 8 of 8 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
L.T. Hampel Corp.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- L.T. Hampel Corp.'s lead technology class is A01K (Animal HUSBANDRY; AVICULTURE; APICULTURE; PISCICULTURE; FISHING; Rearing OR Breeding Animals, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; NEW Breeds OF Animals), 80% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A01K
- Ranked #48,458 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare L.T. Hampel Corp. against Kwikbolt Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 23.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.