Where does Logical Concepts, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Logical Concepts, Inc. ranks #41,473 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Logical Concepts, Inc. hold?

Logical Concepts, Inc. holds 6 US utility patents granted between 2016 and 2021, spanning 8 technology areas.

What is Logical Concepts, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Logical Concepts, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 24.8 out of 100 (16th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Logical Concepts, Inc. focus on?

Logical Concepts, Inc.'s top technology area is H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication) with 2 patents, ranking #6,173 of 8,956 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 8 CPC subclasses total.

Is Logical Concepts, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Logical Concepts, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +100% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Logical Concepts, Inc.'s patents?

Logical Concepts, Inc.'s patents average 13.5 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Logical Concepts, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Logical Concepts, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Logical ranks #41,473 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 8 technology areas.

#41,473
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 16th percentile
by Innovation Score (24.8/100): 13.5
avg claims per patent: +100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R41473 · US Corporation #41,473 · 6 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
LOWER-Q #41,473/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH LM-Instruments OY
CPC-NARROW H04L · 8 areas
INNOV-THIN 24.8/100
CLAIMS-RICH 13.5 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +100% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: LM-Instruments OY (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Logical’s 24.8 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.7 pts (27%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 10.0 pts (40%) Claim depth 8.1 pts (33%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Logical Concepts · this assignee

25
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Logical's Innovation Score is 24.8/100 (16th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Logical?

Each dot is one of Logical’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Logical’s own 13.5 claims/patent is ABOVE the 11.3 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Logical vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Logical's grants concentrate

Logical Concepts, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 33.3% of grants classified under H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Logical sits between LM Wind Power R&D (HOLLAND) B.V. and Lonvis Technology (SHENZHEN) Co., Ltd.

LM Wind Power R&D…

6
Lm-instruments OY

6
Locate Theapeutics

6
Locus Solutions

6
Logue AND PTY

6
Longevity Biotech

6
Longmen Getmore P…

6
Lonvis Technology…

6
Logical Concepts ◀

6

What this shows Logical holds 6 patents at rank #41,369, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Logical

By rank, the assignees closest to #41,369 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Logical's primary technology class.

Logical's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

25 16th percentile higher than 16% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2021

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Logical Concepts, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2016	1	16.7%
2018	1	16.7%
2021	4	66.7%

Which technologies does Logical Concepts, Inc. patent most?

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 2

H04W - Wireless Communication Networks 2

F04B - Positive-displacement Machines FOR LIQUIDS; Pumps 2

F04F - Pumping OF Fluid BY Direct Contact OF Another Fluid OR BY Using Inertia OF Fluid TO BE Pumped ; Siphons 2

F04D - Non-positive-displacement Pumps 2

E03B - Installations OR Methods FOR Obtaining, Collecting, OR Distributing Water 1

E03F - SEWERS; Cesspools 1

E04B - General Building CONSTRUCTIONS; Walls, e.g. PARTITIONS; ROOFS; FLOORS; CEILINGS; Insulation OR Other Protection OF Buildings 1

Top 8 of 8 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Logical Concepts, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Logical Concepts, Inc.'s lead technology class is H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication), 33.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04L
Ranked #41,473 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Logical Concepts, Inc. against LM Wind Power R&D (HOLLAND) B.V., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 24.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.