Overall rank by patents
#24,671
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 2 technology areas, active 2018–2024. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: B60R (VEHICLES, VEHICLE FITTINGS, OR VEHICLE PARTS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR).
The verdict
L.o.f. holds 11 US patents across 2 technology areas, rank #24,671 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
L.o.f., Inc. has been granted 11 US utility patents between 2018 and 2024, placing L.o.f., Inc. at rank #24,671 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 2 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 1.4 claims per patent with primary concentration in B60R (VEHICLES, VEHICLE FITTINGS, OR VEHICLE PARTS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR). As a US Corporation, L.o.f., Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, L.o.f. sits between Kwivo, Llc (11 patents, rank #24,667) and Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy OF Agricultural Sciences (11 patents, rank #24,675) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 17.7/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 6 grants, compared with 5 in the 2015–2019 window, a +20% shift in five-year velocity. Steady filing volume suggests sustained innovation without dramatic pivots. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. L.o.f., Inc.'s 1.4 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while specialization in 2 subclasses reflects a tightly scoped invention area. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark L.o.f., Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Kwivo, LLC
11 patents
Küster Holding GmbH
11 patents
L&O Hunting Group GmbH
11 patents
L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CINCINNATI ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
11 patents
LABORATOIRES THEA
11 patents
LABORATORIES VIVACY
11 patents
LAKEHEAD UNIVERSITY
11 patents
LANZHOU VETERINARY RESEARCH INSTITUTE, CHINESE ACADEMY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES
11 patents
L.O.F., Inc.
11 patents
What this shows L.o.f. holds 11 patents at rank #24,671, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
L.o.f.'s Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
18 Top 96% higher than 4% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 5 | 45.5% |
| 2020 | 4 | 36.4% |
| 2024 | 2 | 18.2% |
Top 2 of 2 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#24,671
Across all tracked assignees
17.7 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
L.o.f.'s 11 grants land it in the top 96% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.