Where does Living Greens Farm, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Living Greens Farm, Inc. ranks #36,278 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Living Greens Farm, Inc. hold?

Living Greens Farm, Inc. holds 7 US utility patents granted between 2016 and 2023, spanning 3 technology areas.

What is Living Greens Farm, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Living Greens Farm, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 24.4 out of 100 (14th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Living Greens Farm, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Living Greens Farm, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +150% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Living Greens Farm, Inc.'s patents?

Living Greens Farm, Inc.'s patents average 11.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Living Greens Farm, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Living Greens Farm, Inc.

Q: What technology areas does Living Greens Farm, Inc. focus on?

Living Greens Farm, Inc.'s top technology area is A01G (HORTICULTURE; Cultivation OF Vegetables, Flowers, Rice, Fruit, Vines, Hops OR SEAWEED; FORESTRY; Watering) with 7 patents, ranking #81 of 635 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 3 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A01G (HORTICULTURE; Cultivation OF Vegetables, Flowers, Rice, Fruit, Vines, Hops OR SEAWEED; FORESTRY; Watering).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Living ranks #36,278 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 3 technology areas.

#36,278
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 14th percentile
by Innovation Score (24.4/100): 11.0
avg claims per patent: +150%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R36278 · US Corporation #36,278 · 7 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
MID-PACK #36,278/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Liquidleds Lighting
CPC-NARROW A01G · 3 areas
INNOV-THIN 24.4/100
CLAIMS-PAR 11.0 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +150% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Liquidleds Lighting Corporation (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Living’s 24.4 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 7.2 pts (30%) Velocity 4.4 pts (18%) Breadth 6.1 pts (25%) Claim depth 6.6 pts (27%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Living Greens Farm · this assignee

24
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Living's Innovation Score is 24.4/100 (14th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Living?

Each dot is one of Living’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Living’s own 11.0 claims/patent is at or below the 14.7 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Living vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Living's grants concentrate

Living Greens Farm, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under A01G (HORTICULTURE; Cultivation OF Vegetables, Flowers, Rice, Fruit, Vines, Hops OR SEAWEED; FORESTRY; Watering). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Living sits between Liquidleds Lighting Corporation and Loadmaster Universal Rigs, Inc..

Living's three-year grant acceleration

Living Greens Farm, Inc. shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Liquidleds Lighti…

7
Lithium Power

7
Littelfuse (Shang…

7
Livehelpnow

7
Livingston Systems

7
Lixin County Ming…

7
Lloyd Baggs Innov…

7
Loadmaster Univer…

7
Living Greens Farm ◀

7

What this shows Living holds 7 patents at rank #36,281, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Living

By rank, the assignees closest to #36,281 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A01G (Horticulture)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Living's primary technology class.

Living's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

24 14th percentile higher than 14% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2023

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Living Greens Farm, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2016	1	14.3%
2017	1	14.3%
2020	2	28.6%
2021	1	14.3%
2022	1	14.3%
2023	1	14.3%

Which technologies does Living Greens Farm, Inc. patent most?

A01G - HORTICULTURE; Cultivation OF Vegetables, Flowers, Rice, Fruit, Vines, Hops OR SEAWEED; FORESTRY; Watering 7

Y02P - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies IN THE Production OR Processing OF Goods 6

Y02A - Technologies FOR Adaptation TO Climate Change 1

Top 3 of 3 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Living Greens Farm, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Living Greens Farm, Inc.'s lead technology class is A01G (HORTICULTURE; Cultivation OF Vegetables, Flowers, Rice, Fruit, Vines, Hops OR SEAWEED; FORESTRY; Watering), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A01G
Ranked #36,278 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Living Greens Farm, Inc. against Liquidleds Lighting Corporation, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 24.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.