Linear Algebra Technologies Limited
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 18 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Linear ranks #16,164 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 18 patents across 7 technology areas.
- #16,164
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 43rd percentile
- by Innovation Score (33.0/100)
- 22.5
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R16164 · Foreign Corporation #16,164 · 18 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 18 grants
- MID-PACK #16,164/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Launch Tech
- CPC-NARROW G06F · 7 areas
- INNOV-THIN 33.0/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 22.5 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Launch Tech Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Linear’s 33.0 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Linear
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Linear Algebra · this assignee 33
Linear Algebra · this assignee
33 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Linear's Innovation Score is 33.0/100 (43rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Linear?
Each dot is one of Linear’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Linear’s own 22.5 claims/patent is ABOVE the 17.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Linear's grants concentrate
Linear Algebra Technologies Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 66.7% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (6 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2019. By volume, Linear sits between Launch Tech Co., Ltd. and Lynntech, Inc..
Who files at Linear's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Launch Tech
Launch Tech Co., Ltd.
18 patents
- Leapfrog Enterpri…
LeapFrog Enterprises, Inc.
18 patents
- Legrand DPC
Legrand DPC, LLC
18 patents
- Lifelens
LifeLens Technologies, Inc.
18 patents
- Lipocosm
Lipocosm, LLC
18 patents
- Little Caesar Ent…
Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc.
18 patents
- Lixte Biotechnolo…
Lixte Biotechnology, Inc.
18 patents
- Lynntech
Lynntech, Inc.
18 patents
- Linear Algebra ◀
Linear Algebra Technologies Limited
18 patents
What this shows Linear holds 18 patents at rank #16,164, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Linear
By rank, the assignees closest to #16,164 in granted patent volume.
- Launch Tech Co., Ltd. #16,160 · 18 patents
- LeapFrog Enterprises, Inc. #16,161 · 18 patents
- Legrand DPC, LLC #16,162 · 18 patents
- LifeLens Technologies, Inc. #16,163 · 18 patents
- Lipocosm, LLC #16,165 · 18 patents
- Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. #16,166 · 18 patents
- Lixte Biotechnology, Inc. #16,167 · 18 patents
- Lynntech, Inc. #16,168 · 18 patents
Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Linear's primary technology class.
- International Business Machines Corporation 42,717 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 21,497 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 16,951 in class
- Google LLC 13,092 in class
- Intel Corporation 12,803 in class
- Apple Inc. 11,007 in class
- Amazon Technologies, Inc. 10,217 in class
- Dell Products L.P. 7,187 in class
Linear's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
33 43rd percentile higher than 43% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 4 | 22.2% |
| 2016 | 3 | 16.7% |
| 2017 | 3 | 16.7% |
| 2018 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 2019 | 2 | 11.1% |
Which technologies does Linear Algebra Technologies Limited patent most?
Top 7 of 7 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Linear Algebra Technologies Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Linear Algebra Technologies Limited's lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 66.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
- Ranked #16,164 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Linear Algebra Technologies Limited against Launch Tech Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 33.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.