Where does Licap Technologies, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Licap Technologies, Inc. ranks #26,746 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Licap Technologies, Inc. hold?

Licap Technologies, Inc. holds 10 US utility patents granted between 2019 and 2025, spanning 6 technology areas.

What is Licap Technologies, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Licap Technologies, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 40.1 out of 100 (top 36% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Licap Technologies, Inc. focus on?

Licap Technologies, Inc.'s top technology area is H01M (Processes OR Means, e.g. Batteries, FOR THE Direct Conversion OF Chemical Energy Into Electrical Energy) with 10 patents, ranking #525 of 2,332 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 6 CPC subclasses total.

Is Licap Technologies, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Licap Technologies, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +250% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Licap Technologies, Inc.'s patents?

Licap Technologies, Inc.'s patents average 16.4 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Licap Technologies, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Licap Technologies, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 10 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H01M (Processes OR Means, e.g. Batteries, FOR THE Direct Conversion OF Chemical Energy Into Electrical Energy).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Licap ranks #26,746 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 10 patents across 6 technology areas.

#26,746
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 36%
by Innovation Score (40.1/100): 16.4
avg claims per patent: +250%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R26746 · US Corporation #26,746 · 10 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 10 grants
MID-PACK #26,746/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH LES Solutions…
CPC-NARROW H01M · 6 areas
INNOV-PAR 40.1/100
CLAIMS-RICH 16.4 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +250% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: LES Solutions MÉDICALES Soundbite Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Licap’s 40.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 8.3 pts (21%) Velocity 13.3 pts (33%) Breadth 8.7 pts (22%) Claim depth 9.8 pts (24%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Licap · this assignee

40
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Licap's Innovation Score is 40.1/100 (top 36% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Licap?

Each dot is one of Licap’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Licap’s own 16.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.4 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Licap vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Licap's grants concentrate

Licap Technologies, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under H01M (Processes OR Means, e.g. Batteries, FOR THE Direct Conversion OF Chemical Energy Into Electrical Energy). Peak complete grant year is 2022 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, Licap sits between LES Solutions MÉDICALES Soundbite Inc. and Logistick, Inc..

Licap's three-year grant acceleration

Licap Technologies, Inc. shows 6 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

LES Solutions MÉD…

10
Leverton Holding

10
Lexogen

10
Lfoundry S R L

10
Link-belt Cranes…

10
Lino Manfrotto +…

10
LMB Mortgage Serv…

10
Logistick

10
Licap ◀

10

What this shows Licap holds 10 patents at rank #26,724, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Licap

By rank, the assignees closest to #26,724 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H01M (Processes OR Means)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Licap's primary technology class.

Licap's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

40 Top 36% higher than 64% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2019–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Licap Technologies, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2019	2	20.0%
2020	1	10.0%
2022	3	30.0%
2023	1	10.0%
2024	2	20.0%
2025partial year	1	10.0%

Which technologies does Licap Technologies, Inc. patent most?

H01M - Processes OR Means, e.g. Batteries, FOR THE Direct Conversion OF Chemical Energy Into Electrical Energy 10

Y02E - Reduction OF Greenhouse GAS [GHG] Emissions, Related TO Energy Generation, Transmission OR Distribution 9

H01G - CAPACITORS; Capacitors, Rectifiers, Detectors, Switching Devices, Light-sensitive OR Temperature-sensitive Devices OF THE Electrolytic Type 5

Y02P - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies IN THE Production OR Processing OF Goods 1

G06N - Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models 1

H02J - Circuit Arrangements OR Systems FOR Supplying OR Distributing Electric POWER; Systems FOR Storing Electric Energy 1

Top 6 of 6 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Licap Technologies, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Licap Technologies, Inc.'s lead technology class is H01M (Processes OR Means, e.g. Batteries, FOR THE Direct Conversion OF Chemical Energy Into Electrical Energy), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H01M
Ranked #26,746 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Licap Technologies, Inc. against LES Solutions MÉDICALES Soundbite Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 40.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.