Lewis Hyman, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A47B (TABLES; DESKS; Office FURNITURE; CABINETS; DRAWERS; General Details OF Furniture).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Lewis ranks #32,333 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 2 technology areas.
- #32,333
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 39th percentile
- by Innovation Score (31.7/100)
- 15.1
- avg claims per patent
- +400%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R32333 · US Corporation #32,333 · 8 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
- MID-PACK #32,333/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH LeoLabs
- CPC-NARROW A47B · 2 areas
- INNOV-THIN 31.7/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 15.1 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-SURGE +400% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: LeoLabs, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Lewis’s 31.7 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Lewis
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Lewis Hyman · this assignee 32
Lewis Hyman · this assignee
32 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Lewis's Innovation Score is 31.7/100 (39th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Lewis?
Each dot is one of Lewis’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Lewis’s own 15.1 claims/patent is at or below the 19.5 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Lewis's grants concentrate
Lewis Hyman, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 62.5% of grants classified under A47B (TABLES; DESKS; Office FURNITURE; CABINETS; DRAWERS; General Details OF Furniture). By volume, Lewis sits between LeoLabs, Inc. and Liberty Reach Inc..
Lewis's three-year grant acceleration
Lewis Hyman, Inc. shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Lewis's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Leolabs
LeoLabs, Inc.
8 patents
- Leonidas IP
Leonidas IP, LLC
8 patents
- Leuze + KG
Leuze electronic GmbH + Co. KG
8 patents
- Leviticus Cardio
Leviticus Cardio Ltd.
8 patents
- Li &
Li & Co AG
8 patents
- Li Industries
Li Industries, Inc.
8 patents
- Libertine FPE
Libertine FPE Ltd
8 patents
- Liberty Reach
Liberty Reach Inc.
8 patents
- Lewis Hyman ◀
Lewis Hyman, Inc.
8 patents
What this shows Lewis holds 8 patents at rank #32,353, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Lewis
By rank, the assignees closest to #32,353 in granted patent volume.
- LeoLabs, Inc. #32,349 · 8 patents
- Leonidas IP, LLC #32,350 · 8 patents
- Leuze electronic GmbH + Co. KG #32,351 · 8 patents
- Leviticus Cardio Ltd. #32,352 · 8 patents
- Li & Co AG #32,354 · 8 patents
- Li Industries, Inc. #32,355 · 8 patents
- Libertine FPE Ltd #32,356 · 8 patents
- Liberty Reach Inc. #32,357 · 8 patents
Leaders in A47B (Tables)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Lewis's primary technology class.
Lewis's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
32 39th percentile higher than 39% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2020 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2021 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2022 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2023 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2024 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2025partial year | 2 | 25.0% |
Which technologies does Lewis Hyman, Inc. patent most?
Top 2 of 2 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Lewis Hyman, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Lewis Hyman, Inc.'s lead technology class is A47B (TABLES; DESKS; Office FURNITURE; CABINETS; DRAWERS; General Details OF Furniture), 62.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A47B
- Ranked #32,333 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Lewis Hyman, Inc. against LeoLabs, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 31.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.