LB Bentley Limited
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F16K (VALVES; TAPS; COCKS; ACTUATING-FLOATS; Devices FOR Venting OR Aerating).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, LB ranks #41,367 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 5 technology areas.
- #41,367
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 11th percentile
- by Innovation Score (22.6/100)
- 13.3
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R41367 · Foreign Corporation #41,367 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #41,367/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Laser Ammo
- CPC-NARROW F16K · 5 areas
- INNOV-THIN 22.6/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 13.3 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Laser Ammo Ltd. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How LB’s 22.6 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around LB
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- LB Bentley · this assignee 23
LB Bentley · this assignee
23 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows LB's Innovation Score is 22.6/100 (11th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for LB?
Each dot is one of LB’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). LB’s own 13.3 claims/patent is ABOVE the 9.7 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where LB's grants concentrate
LB Bentley Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 83.3% of grants classified under F16K (VALVES; TAPS; COCKS; ACTUATING-FLOATS; Devices FOR Venting OR Aerating). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (4 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2019. By volume, LB sits between Laser Ammo Ltd. and LBT Innovations Limited.
Who files at LB's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Laser Ammo
Laser Ammo Ltd.
6 patents
- Lateral Solutions
Lateral Solutions, Inc.
6 patents
- Latitude Pharmace…
Latitude Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
6 patents
- Laughable Toys
Laughable Toys, LLC
6 patents
- LB Europe
LB Europe Limited
6 patents
- LB USA Flexibles
LB USA Flexibles, Inc.
6 patents
- Lbsemicon
Lbsemicon Co., Ltd.
6 patents
- LBT Innovations
LBT Innovations Limited
6 patents
- LB Bentley ◀
LB Bentley Limited
6 patents
What this shows LB holds 6 patents at rank #41,318, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near LB
By rank, the assignees closest to #41,318 in granted patent volume.
- Laser Ammo Ltd. #41,314 · 6 patents
- Lateral Solutions, Inc. #41,315 · 6 patents
- Latitude Pharmaceuticals, Inc. #41,316 · 6 patents
- Laughable Toys, LLC #41,317 · 6 patents
- LB Europe Limited #41,319 · 6 patents
- LB USA Flexibles, Inc. #41,320 · 6 patents
- Lbsemicon Co., Ltd. #41,321 · 6 patents
- LBT Innovations Limited #41,322 · 6 patents
Leaders in F16K (Valves)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in LB's primary technology class.
- Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation (HSC) 309 in class
- Fisher Controls International LLC 309 in class
- Fujikin Incorporated 153 in class
- Cameron International Corporation 136 in class
- Emerson Process Management Regulator Technologies, Inc. 129 in class
- Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. 123 in class
- Mueller International, LLC 110 in class
- Kohler Co. 103 in class
LB's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
23 11th percentile higher than 11% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 4 | 66.7% |
| 2019 | 2 | 33.3% |
Which technologies does LB Bentley Limited patent most?
Top 5 of 5 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
LB Bentley Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- LB Bentley Limited's lead technology class is F16K (VALVES; TAPS; COCKS; ACTUATING-FLOATS; Devices FOR Venting OR Aerating), 83.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F16K
- Ranked #41,367 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare LB Bentley Limited against Laser Ammo Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 22.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.