Overall rank by patents
#9,301
of 50,000 tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 34 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Layer3 ranks #9,301 of 50,000 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 34 patents across 0 technology areas.
Layer3 TV, Inc. has been granted 34 US utility patents between 2016 and 2018, placing Layer3 TV, Inc. at #9,301 of 50,000 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 0 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 1.0 claims per patent. As a US Corporation, Layer3 TV, Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Layer3 sits between KUNA Systems Corporation (34 patents, rank #9,296) and Landscape Structures Inc. (34 patents, rank #9,304) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 12.9/100 blends portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Grant cadence records the difference between two grant-year windows. Between 2020 and 2024 the company received 0 grants, compared with 34 in the 2015–2019 window, a -100% shift in five-year grant velocity. Both windows cover five complete grant years; the latest PatentsView year is a partial release and is excluded from this comparison, though it still appears in the yearly table and chart below. Grant timing can lag the related application by years, so this comparison does not establish current R&D spending, strategic intent, or a company’s application activity. The US Corporation classification provides context for the assignee record, not a conclusion about its business strategy.
Claim depth and technology breadth describe this aggregate record. Layer3 TV, Inc.'s 1.0 average claims per patent is an average count, not a measure of claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk. The record spans 0 CPC subclasses. Combined with portfolio volume, these figures let readers compare the documented grant records of assignees in similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
KUNA SYSTEMS CORPORATION
34 patents
KYPHON SARL
34 patents
Kdesign GmbH
34 patents
Korea Internet & Security Agency
34 patents
LIEBHERR MACHINES BULLE SA
34 patents
LOGICDATA Electronic & Software Entwicklungs GmbH
34 patents
LTAG SYSTEMS LLC
34 patents
Landscape Structures Inc.
34 patents
LAYER3 TV, INC.
34 patents
What this shows Layer3 holds 34 patents at rank #9,300, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #9,300 in granted patent volume.
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Layer3, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (13 here).
Layer3's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
13 Top 98% higher than 2% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 17 | 50.0% |
| 2017 | 13 | 38.2% |
| 2018 | 4 | 11.8% |
Historical grant data only; it does not rate legal strength or current strategy.
Overall rank by patents
#9,301
of 50,000 tracked assignees
12.9 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Layer3's 34 grants land it in the top 98% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.