Lava Industries, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A45D (Hairdressing OR Shaving Equipment ; Equipment FOR Cosmetics OR Cosmetic Treatments, e.g. FOR Manicuring OR Pedicuring).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Lava ranks #41,364 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 2 technology areas.
- #41,364
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 4th percentile
- by Innovation Score (17.2/100)
- 9.2
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R41364 · US Corporation #41,364 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #41,364/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Laser Elevations
- CPC-NARROW A45D · 2 areas
- INNOV-LOW 17.2/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 9.2 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Laser Elevations, LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Lava’s 17.2 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Lava
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Lava Industries · this assignee 17
Lava Industries · this assignee
17 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Lava's Innovation Score is 17.2/100 (4th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Lava?
Each dot is one of Lava’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Lava’s own 9.2 claims/patent is at or below the 14.7 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Lava's grants concentrate
Lava Industries, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under A45D (Hairdressing OR Shaving Equipment ; Equipment FOR Cosmetics OR Cosmetic Treatments, e.g. FOR Manicuring OR Pedicuring). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Lava sits between Laser Elevations, LLC and LeBeau Inc..
Who files at Lava's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Laser Elevations
Laser Elevations, LLC
6 patents
- Laser Zentrum Han…
Laser Zentrum Hannover EV
6 patents
- Lasersharp Flexpa…
LaserSharp FlexPak Services, LLC
6 patents
- Latent Heat Solut…
Latent Heat Solutions, LLC
6 patents
- Law Enforcement I…
Law Enforcement Intelligent Devices, LLC
6 patents
- Lawrence Livermor…
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
6 patents
- Le Technology
Le Technology, Inc.
6 patents
- Lebeau
LeBeau Inc.
6 patents
- Lava Industries ◀
Lava Industries, Inc.
6 patents
What this shows Lava holds 6 patents at rank #41,416, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Lava
By rank, the assignees closest to #41,416 in granted patent volume.
- Laser Elevations, LLC #41,412 · 6 patents
- Laser Zentrum Hannover EV #41,413 · 6 patents
- LaserSharp FlexPak Services, LLC #41,414 · 6 patents
- Latent Heat Solutions, LLC #41,415 · 6 patents
- Law Enforcement Intelligent Devices, LLC #41,417 · 6 patents
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory #41,418 · 6 patents
- Le Technology, Inc. #41,419 · 6 patents
- LeBeau Inc. #41,420 · 6 patents
Leaders in A45D (Hairdressing OR Shaving Equipment)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Lava's primary technology class.
Lava's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
17 4th percentile higher than 4% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 3 | 50.0% |
| 2017 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2018 | 1 | 16.7% |
Which technologies does Lava Industries, Inc. patent most?
Top 2 of 2 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Lava Industries, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Lava Industries, Inc.'s lead technology class is A45D (Hairdressing OR Shaving Equipment ; Equipment FOR Cosmetics OR Cosmetic Treatments, e.g. FOR Manicuring OR Pedicuring), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A45D
- Ranked #41,364 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Lava Industries, Inc. against Laser Elevations, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 17.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.