Overall rank by patents
#48,289
of 49,997 tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G10D (Stringed Musical INSTRUMENTS; Wind Musical INSTRUMENTS; Accordions OR CONCERTINAS; Percussion Musical INSTRUMENTS; Aeolian HARPS; Singing-flame Musical INSTRUMENTS; Musical Instruments NOT Otherwise P).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Larsen ranks #48,289 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 6 technology areas.
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R48289 · Foreign Corporation #48,289 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
Nearest grant-volume peer: Langston Companies, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
Larsen Strings A/S · this assignee
49 score
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Larsen's Innovation Score is 48.6/100 (top 16% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Larsen Strings A/S is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G10D (Stringed Musical INSTRUMENTS; Wind Musical INSTRUMENTS; Accordions OR CONCERTINAS; Percussion Musical INSTRUMENTS; Aeolian HARPS; Singing-flame Musical INSTRUMENTS; Musical Instruments NOT Otherwise P). Peak complete grant year is 2022 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Larsen sits between Langston Companies, Inc. and LaunchLab, Inc..
Larsen Strings A/S shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Langston Companies, Inc.
5 patents
Language Weaver, Inc.
5 patents
Lankhorst Engineered Products B.V.
5 patents
Largo Clean Energy Corp.
5 patents
Laser Imaging Systems GmbH
5 patents
LaserLine Mfg., Inc.
5 patents
Lateral Reality Kft.
5 patents
LaunchLab, Inc.
5 patents
Larsen Strings A/S
5 patents
What this shows Larsen holds 5 patents at rank #48,406, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #48,406 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Larsen's primary technology class.
Larsen's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
49 Top 16% higher than 84% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2022 | 3 | 60.0% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 20.0% |
Top 6 of 6 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#48,289
of 49,997 tracked assignees
48.6 out of 100
What to do with this data
Larsen Strings A/S's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.