Where does Lange Uhren GmbH rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Lange Uhren GmbH ranks #18,830 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Lange Uhren GmbH hold?

Lange Uhren GmbH holds 15 US utility patents granted between 2016 and 2024, spanning 1 technology areas.

What is Lange Uhren GmbH's Innovation Score?

Lange Uhren GmbH has an Innovation Score of 15.8 out of 100 (3rd percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Lange Uhren GmbH's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Lange Uhren GmbH's recent grant velocity is -50% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Lange Uhren GmbH's patents?

Lange Uhren GmbH's patents average 2.2 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Lange Uhren GmbH patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Lange Uhren GmbH

Q: What technology areas does Lange Uhren GmbH focus on?

Lange Uhren GmbH's top technology area is G04B (Mechanically-driven Clocks OR WATCHES; Mechanical Parts OF Clocks OR Watches IN GENERAL; Time Pieces Using THE Position OF THE SUN, Moon OR Stars) with 1 patents, ranking #59 of 92 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 1 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 15 granted patents across 1 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G04B (Mechanically-driven Clocks OR WATCHES; Mechanical Parts OF Clocks OR Watches IN GENERAL; Time Pieces Using THE Position OF THE SUN, Moon OR Stars).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Lange ranks #18,830 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 15 patents across 1 technology areas.

#18,830
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 3rd percentile
by Innovation Score (15.8/100): 2.2
avg claims per patent: -50%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R18830 · Foreign Corporation #18,830 · 15 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 15 grants
MID-PACK #18,830/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Lambda Nu Technology
CPC-NARROW G04B · 1 areas
INNOV-LOW 15.8/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 2.2 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DROP -50% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Lambda Nu Technology LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Lange’s 15.8 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 9.6 pts (61%) Velocity 1.3 pts (8%) Breadth 3.5 pts (22%) Claim depth 1.3 pts (8%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Lange Uhren · this assignee

16
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Lange's Innovation Score is 15.8/100 (3rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Lange?

Each dot is one of Lange’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Lange’s own 2.2 claims/patent is at or below the 12.2 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Lange vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Lange's grants concentrate

Lange Uhren GmbH is a focused PatentsView assignee: 1 CPC subclasses with 6.7% of grants classified under G04B (Mechanically-driven Clocks OR WATCHES; Mechanical Parts OF Clocks OR Watches IN GENERAL; Time Pieces Using THE Position OF THE SUN, Moon OR Stars). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (6 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Lange sits between Lotte Co., Ltd. and Leibniz-Institut für Festkörper- und, Werkstoffforschung Dresden e. V..

Lange's three-year grant acceleration

Lange Uhren GmbH shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 5 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Lotte

15
Lvmh Fragrance Br…

15
LY

15
Lambda Nu Technol…

15
Laser Aiming Syst…

15
Leapyear

15
Lechler

15
Leibniz-institut…

15
Lange Uhren ◀

15

What this shows Lange holds 15 patents at rank #18,847, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Lange

By rank, the assignees closest to #18,847 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G04B (Mechanically-driven Clocks OR Watches)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Lange's primary technology class.

Lange's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

16 3rd percentile higher than 3% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Lange Uhren GmbH patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2016	3	20.0%
2018	6	40.0%
2019	1	6.7%
2020	4	26.7%
2024	1	6.7%

Which technologies does Lange Uhren GmbH patent most?

G04B - Mechanically-driven Clocks OR WATCHES; Mechanical Parts OF Clocks OR Watches IN GENERAL; Time Pieces Using THE Position OF THE SUN, Moon OR Stars 1

Top 1 of 1 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Lange Uhren GmbH's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Lange Uhren GmbH's lead technology class is G04B (Mechanically-driven Clocks OR WATCHES; Mechanical Parts OF Clocks OR Watches IN GENERAL; Time Pieces Using THE Position OF THE SUN, Moon OR Stars), 6.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G04B
Ranked #18,830 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Lange Uhren GmbH against Lotte Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 15.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.