Langdon Incorporated
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F24F (AIR-CONDITIONING; AIR-HUMIDIFICATION; VENTILATION; USE OF AIR Currents FOR Screening).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Langdon ranks #41,347 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 2 technology areas.
- #41,347
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 6th percentile
- by Innovation Score (19.8/100)
- 13.5
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R41347 · US Corporation #41,347 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #41,347/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Lampe Holding B V
- CPC-NARROW F24F · 2 areas
- INNOV-LOW 19.8/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 13.5 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Lampe Holding B.V. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Langdon’s 19.8 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Langdon
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Langdon Incorporated · this assignee 20
Langdon Incorporated · this assignee
20 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Langdon's Innovation Score is 19.8/100 (6th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Langdon?
Each dot is one of Langdon’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Langdon’s own 13.5 claims/patent is ABOVE the 11.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Langdon's grants concentrate
Langdon Incorporated is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 66.7% of grants classified under F24F (AIR-CONDITIONING; AIR-HUMIDIFICATION; VENTILATION; USE OF AIR Currents FOR Screening). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Langdon sits between Lampe Holding B.V. and Laser Elevations, LLC.
Who files at Langdon's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Lampe Holding B V
Lampe Holding B.V.
6 patents
- Lanard Toys
Lanard Toys Limited
6 patents
- Lancer Systems
Lancer Systems LP
6 patents
- Land Rover
Land Rover
6 patents
- Language
Language Technologies, Inc.
6 patents
- Lappset Group Oy
Lappset Group Oy
6 patents
- Lapto
Lapto Co., Ltd.
6 patents
- Laser Elevations
Laser Elevations, LLC
6 patents
- Langdon Incorpora… ◀
Langdon Incorporated
6 patents
What this shows Langdon holds 6 patents at rank #41,408, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Langdon
By rank, the assignees closest to #41,408 in granted patent volume.
- Lampe Holding B.V. #41,404 · 6 patents
- Lanard Toys Limited #41,405 · 6 patents
- Lancer Systems LP #41,406 · 6 patents
- Land Rover #41,407 · 6 patents
- Language Technologies, Inc. #41,409 · 6 patents
- Lappset Group Oy #41,410 · 6 patents
- Lapto Co., Ltd. #41,411 · 6 patents
- Laser Elevations, LLC #41,412 · 6 patents
Leaders in F24F (Air-conditioning)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Langdon's primary technology class.
- Mitsubishi Electric Corporation 999 in class
- LG Electronics Inc. 599 in class
- Daikin Industries, Ltd. 589 in class
- Johnson Controls Technology Company 410 in class
- Lennox Industries Inc. 376 in class
- Honeywell International Inc. 330 in class
- Johnson Controls Tyco IP Holdings LLP 302 in class
- Carrier Corporation 264 in class
Langdon's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
20 6th percentile higher than 6% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2016 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2017 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2018 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2019 | 1 | 16.7% |
Which technologies does Langdon Incorporated patent most?
Top 2 of 2 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Langdon Incorporated's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Langdon Incorporated's lead technology class is F24F (AIR-CONDITIONING; AIR-HUMIDIFICATION; VENTILATION; USE OF AIR Currents FOR Screening), 66.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F24F
- Ranked #41,347 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Langdon Incorporated against Lampe Holding B.V., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 19.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.