Lacks Home Products
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 16 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F21S (Non-portable Lighting DEVICES; Systems THEREOF; Vehicle Lighting Devices Specially Adapted FOR Vehicle Exteriors).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Lacks ranks #17,838 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 16 patents across 6 technology areas.
- #17,838
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 7th percentile
- by Innovation Score (20.5/100)
- 3.4
- avg claims per patent
- -86%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R17838 · US Corporation #17,838 · 16 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 16 grants
- MID-PACK #17,838/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Lenovo (Singapore)…
- CPC-NARROW F21S · 6 areas
- INNOV-THIN 20.5/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 3.4 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -86% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Lenovo (Singapore) Pte. Ltd., New Tech Park (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Lacks’s 20.5 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Lacks
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Lacks Home Products · this assignee 21
Lacks Home Products · this assignee
21 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Lacks's Innovation Score is 20.5/100 (7th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Lacks?
Each dot is one of Lacks’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Lacks’s own 3.4 claims/patent is at or below the 14.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Lacks's grants concentrate
Lacks Home Products is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 12.5% of grants classified under F21S (Non-portable Lighting DEVICES; Systems THEREOF; Vehicle Lighting Devices Specially Adapted FOR Vehicle Exteriors). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (9 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2020. By volume, Lacks sits between Lomox Limited and Lilium eAircraft GmbH.
Who files at Lacks's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Lomox
Lomox Limited
16 patents
- Lumetique
Lumetique, Inc.
16 patents
- Luxnet
Luxnet Corporation
16 patents
- LX Hausys America
LX Hausys America, Inc.
16 patents
- Lenovo (Singapore…
Lenovo (Singapore) Pte. Ltd., New Tech Park
16 patents
- Leum Engineering
Leum Engineering, Inc.
16 patents
- Liftwave
Liftwave, Inc.
16 patents
- Lilium eaircraft
Lilium eAircraft GmbH
16 patents
- Lacks Home Produc… ◀
Lacks Home Products
16 patents
What this shows Lacks holds 16 patents at rank #17,851, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Lacks
By rank, the assignees closest to #17,851 in granted patent volume.
- Lomox Limited #17,847 · 16 patents
- Lumetique, Inc. #17,848 · 16 patents
- Luxnet Corporation #17,849 · 16 patents
- LX Hausys America, Inc. #17,850 · 16 patents
- Lenovo (Singapore) Pte. Ltd., New Tech Park #17,852 · 16 patents
- Leum Engineering, Inc. #17,853 · 16 patents
- Liftwave, Inc. #17,854 · 16 patents
- Lilium eAircraft GmbH #17,855 · 16 patents
Leaders in F21S (Non-portable Lighting Devices)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Lacks's primary technology class.
Lacks's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
21 7th percentile higher than 7% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 5 | 31.3% |
| 2019 | 9 | 56.3% |
| 2020 | 2 | 12.5% |
Which technologies does Lacks Home Products patent most?
Top 6 of 6 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Lacks Home Products's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Lacks Home Products's lead technology class is F21S (Non-portable Lighting DEVICES; Systems THEREOF; Vehicle Lighting Devices Specially Adapted FOR Vehicle Exteriors), 12.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F21S
- Ranked #17,838 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Lacks Home Products against Lomox Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 20.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.