LAB Society LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 13 granted patents across 1 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B01D (Separation).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, LAB ranks #21,362 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 13 patents across 1 technology areas.
- #21,362
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 3rd percentile
- by Innovation Score (16.0/100)
- 4.5
- avg claims per patent
- +125%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R21362 · US Corporation #21,362 · 13 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 13 grants
- MID-PACK #21,362/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Kuhn-Geldrop B V
- CPC-NARROW B01D · 1 areas
- INNOV-LOW 16.0/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 4.5 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-SURGE +125% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Kuhn-Geldrop B.V. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How LAB’s 16.0 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around LAB
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- LAB Society · this assignee 16
LAB Society · this assignee
16 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows LAB's Innovation Score is 16.0/100 (3rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for LAB?
Each dot is one of LAB’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). LAB’s own 4.5 claims/patent is at or below the 14.5 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where LAB's grants concentrate
LAB Society LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 1 CPC subclasses with 15.4% of grants classified under B01D (Separation). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (6 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, LAB sits between Kuhn-Geldrop B.V. and LB Marketing, Inc..
LAB's three-year grant acceleration
LAB Society LLC shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 11 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at LAB's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Kuhn-geldrop B V
Kuhn-Geldrop B.V.
13 patents
- L&K Biomed
L&K Biomed Co., Ltd.
13 patents
- L B Foster Rail
L.B. Foster Rail Technologies, Inc.
13 patents
- LA Trobe Universi…
LA Trobe University
13 patents
- Lakeview Innovati…
Lakeview Innovation Ltd.
13 patents
- Larq
Larq, Inc.
13 patents
- Laser Systems & S…
Laser Systems & Solutions OF Europe
13 patents
- LB Marketing
LB Marketing, Inc.
13 patents
- LAB Society ◀
LAB Society LLC
13 patents
What this shows LAB holds 13 patents at rank #21,361, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near LAB
By rank, the assignees closest to #21,361 in granted patent volume.
- Kuhn-Geldrop B.V. #21,357 · 13 patents
- L&K Biomed Co., Ltd. #21,358 · 13 patents
- L.B. Foster Rail Technologies, Inc. #21,359 · 13 patents
- LA Trobe University #21,360 · 13 patents
- Lakeview Innovation Ltd. #21,362 · 13 patents
- Larq, Inc. #21,363 · 13 patents
- Laser Systems & Solutions OF Europe #21,364 · 13 patents
- LB Marketing, Inc. #21,365 · 13 patents
Leaders in B01D (Separation)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in LAB's primary technology class.
LAB's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
16 3rd percentile higher than 3% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 1 | 7.7% |
| 2019 | 3 | 23.1% |
| 2020 | 6 | 46.2% |
| 2021 | 2 | 15.4% |
| 2023 | 1 | 7.7% |
Which technologies does LAB Society LLC patent most?
Top 1 of 1 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
LAB Society LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- LAB Society LLC's lead technology class is B01D (Separation), 15.4% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B01D
- Ranked #21,362 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare LAB Society LLC against Kuhn-Geldrop B.V., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 16.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.