USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Kyocera Mita Corporation

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 14 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2017. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G03G (ELECTROGRAPHY; ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHY; Magnetography).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Kyocera ranks #19,998 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 14 patents across 6 technology areas.

#19,998
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
12th percentile
by Innovation Score (23.6/100)
9.3
avg claims per patent
-100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R19998 · Foreign Corporation #19,998 · 14 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 14 grants
  • MID-PACK #19,998/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Ubitus
  • CPC-NARROW G03G · 6 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 23.6/100
  • CLAIMS-PAR 9.3 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-DROP -100% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Kabushiki Kaisha Ubitus (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Kyocera’s 23.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Kyocera

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Kyocera's Innovation Score is 23.6/100 (12th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Kyocera?

Each dot is one of Kyocera’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Kyocera’s own 9.3 claims/patent is ABOVE the 8.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Kyocera vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 13.913.91414.1 0102030 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Korean AIR Lines Co., Ltd - 14, 4.36Korean AIR LinesKumho Electric, Inc. - 14, 8.21Kumho ElectricKUN Shan University - 14, 8.64KUN Shan Universi…Kwai Games PTE. Ltd. - 14, 1Kwai Games PTEKabushiki Kaisha Ubitus - 14, 13.43UbitusKaminario Technologies Ltd. - 14, 27.57KaminarioKaunas University of Technology - 14, 11.5Kaunas University…Keith Manufacturing Co. - 14, 6.71Keith Manufacturi…Kyocera Mita Corporation - 14, 9.29Kyocera Mita
Kyocera vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Kyocera's grants concentrate

Kyocera Mita Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 78.6% of grants classified under G03G (ELECTROGRAPHY; ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHY; Magnetography). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (11 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Kyocera sits between Korean AIR Lines Co., Ltd and Keith Manufacturing Co..

Who files at Kyocera's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Kyocera holds 14 patents at rank #19,979, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Kyocera

By rank, the assignees closest to #19,979 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G03G (Electrography)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Kyocera's primary technology class.

Kyocera's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

24 12th percentile higher than 12% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

051015 201520162017 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2017

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Kyocera Mita Corporation patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 11 78.6%
2016 2 14.3%
2017 1 7.1%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Kyocera Mita Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Kyocera Mita Corporation's lead technology class is G03G (ELECTROGRAPHY; ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHY; Magnetography), 78.6% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G03G
  • Ranked #19,998 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Kyocera Mita Corporation against Korean AIR Lines Co., Ltd, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 23.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.