Where does Krug & Priester GmbH & Co. KG rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Krug & Priester GmbH & Co. KG ranks #41,297 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Krug & Priester GmbH & Co. KG hold?

Krug & Priester GmbH & Co. KG holds 6 US utility patents granted between 2017 and 2023, spanning 2 technology areas.

What is Krug & Priester GmbH & Co. KG's Innovation Score?

Krug & Priester GmbH & Co. KG has an Innovation Score of 38.0 out of 100 (top 42% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Krug & Priester GmbH & Co. KG's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Krug & Priester GmbH & Co. KG's recent grant velocity is +400% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Krug & Priester GmbH & Co. KG's patents?

Krug & Priester GmbH & Co. KG's patents average 10.5 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Krug & Priester GmbH & Co. KG patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Krug & Priester GmbH & Co. KG

Q: What technology areas does Krug & Priester GmbH & Co. KG focus on?

Krug & Priester GmbH & Co. KG's top technology area is B26D (CUTTING; Details Common TO Machines FOR Perforating, Punching, Cutting-out, Stamping-out OR Severing) with 4 patents, ranking #92 of 595 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 2 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B26D (CUTTING; Details Common TO Machines FOR Perforating, Punching, Cutting-out, Stamping-out OR Severing).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Krug ranks #41,297 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 2 technology areas.

#41,297
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 42%
by Innovation Score (38.0/100): 10.5
avg claims per patent: +400%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R41297 · Foreign Corporation #41,297 · 6 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
LOWER-Q #41,297/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Kozhya SP Z O O
CPC-NARROW B26D · 2 areas
INNOV-THIN 38.0/100
CLAIMS-PAR 10.5 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-SURGE +400% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Kozhya LLC SP. Z O.O. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Krug’s 38.0 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.7 pts (18%) Velocity 20.0 pts (53%) Breadth 5.0 pts (13%) Claim depth 6.3 pts (17%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Krug & Priester & KG · this assignee

38
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Krug's Innovation Score is 38.0/100 (top 42% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Krug?

Each dot is one of Krug’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Krug’s own 10.5 claims/patent is at or below the 15.5 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Krug vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Krug's grants concentrate

Krug & Priester GmbH & Co. KG is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 66.7% of grants classified under B26D (CUTTING; Details Common TO Machines FOR Perforating, Punching, Cutting-out, Stamping-out OR Severing). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Krug sits between Kozhya LLC SP. Z O.O. and Kulicke & Soffa Netherlands B.V..

Krug's three-year grant acceleration

Krug & Priester GmbH & Co. KG shows 5 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Kozhya SP Z O O

6
Kramden Enterpris…

6
Kratos SRE

6
Krinner Innovation

6
Krusader

6
Kudos Mechanical

6
Kulicke & Soffa L…

6
Kulicke & Soffa N…

6
Krug & Priester &… ◀

6

What this shows Krug holds 6 patents at rank #41,285, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Krug

By rank, the assignees closest to #41,285 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B26D (Cutting)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Krug's primary technology class.

Krug's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

38 Top 42% higher than 58% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2017–2023

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Krug & Priester GmbH & Co. KG patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2017	1	16.7%
2022	1	16.7%
2023	4	66.7%

Which technologies does Krug & Priester GmbH & Co. KG patent most?

B26D - CUTTING; Details Common TO Machines FOR Perforating, Punching, Cutting-out, Stamping-out OR Severing 4

B23D - PLANING; SLOTTING; SHEARING; BROACHING; SAWING; FILING; SCRAPING; Like Operations FOR Working Metal BY Removing Material, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 1

Top 2 of 2 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Krug & Priester GmbH & Co. KG's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Krug & Priester GmbH & Co. KG's lead technology class is B26D (CUTTING; Details Common TO Machines FOR Perforating, Punching, Cutting-out, Stamping-out OR Severing), 66.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B26D
Ranked #41,297 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Krug & Priester GmbH & Co. KG against Kozhya LLC SP. Z O.O., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 38.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.