Where does Koninklijke BAM Groep N.V. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Koninklijke BAM Groep N.V. ranks #48,206 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Koninklijke BAM Groep N.V. hold?

Koninklijke BAM Groep N.V. holds 5 US utility patents granted between 2017 and 2024, spanning 9 technology areas.

What is Koninklijke BAM Groep N.V.'s Innovation Score?

Koninklijke BAM Groep N.V. has an Innovation Score of 31.9 out of 100 (39th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Koninklijke BAM Groep N.V. focus on?

Koninklijke BAM Groep N.V.'s top technology area is E02B (Hydraulic Engineering) with 3 patents, ranking #72 of 256 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 9 CPC subclasses total.

Is Koninklijke BAM Groep N.V.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Koninklijke BAM Groep N.V.'s recent grant velocity is +50% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Koninklijke BAM Groep N.V.'s patents?

Koninklijke BAM Groep N.V.'s patents average 14.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Koninklijke BAM Groep N.V. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Koninklijke BAM Groep N.V.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 9 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: E02B (Hydraulic Engineering).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Koninklijke ranks #48,206 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 9 technology areas.

#48,206
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 39th percentile
by Innovation Score (31.9/100): 14.0
avg claims per patent: +50%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R48206 · Foreign Corporation #48,206 · 5 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
BOTTOM-DECILE #48,206/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Koite Health Oy
CPC-NARROW E02B · 9 areas
INNOV-THIN 31.9/100
CLAIMS-RICH 14.0 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-SURGE +50% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Koite Health Oy (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Koninklijke’s 31.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.2 pts (19%) Velocity 6.7 pts (21%) Breadth 10.6 pts (33%) Claim depth 8.4 pts (26%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Koninklijke BAM Groep · this assignee

32
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Koninklijke's Innovation Score is 31.9/100 (39th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Koninklijke?

Each dot is one of Koninklijke’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Koninklijke’s own 14.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 12.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Koninklijke vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Koninklijke's grants concentrate

Koninklijke BAM Groep N.V. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 9 CPC subclasses with 60% of grants classified under E02B (Hydraulic Engineering). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Koninklijke sits between Koite Health Oy and Kore Semiconductor Co., Ltd..

Koninklijke's three-year grant acceleration

Koninklijke BAM Groep N.V. shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Koite Health Oy

5
Koleto Innovations

5
Komet Austria

5
Komline-sanderson

5
Konrad Hornschuch

5
Korber Tissue S p…

5
Kore Design

5
Kore Semiconductor

5
Koninklijke BAM G… ◀

5

What this shows Koninklijke holds 5 patents at rank #48,249, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Koninklijke

By rank, the assignees closest to #48,249 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in E02B (Hydraulic Engineering)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Koninklijke's primary technology class.

Koninklijke's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

32 39th percentile higher than 39% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2017–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Koninklijke BAM Groep N.V. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2017	1	20.0%
2019	1	20.0%
2020	1	20.0%
2024	2	40.0%

Which technologies does Koninklijke BAM Groep N.V. patent most?

E02B - Hydraulic Engineering 3

E01B - Permanent WAY; Permanent-way TOOLS; Machines FOR Making Railways OF ALL Kinds 2

Y02A - Technologies FOR Adaptation TO Climate Change 2

Y02E - Reduction OF Greenhouse GAS [GHG] Emissions, Related TO Energy Generation, Transmission OR Distribution 1

E02D - FOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; Embankments ; Underground OR Underwater Structures 1

F03D - Wind Motors 1

Y02B - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies Related TO Buildings, e.g. Housing, House Appliances OR Related End-user Applications 1

Y02P - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies IN THE Production OR Processing OF Goods 1

F05B - Indexing Scheme Relating TO Wind, Spring, Weight, Inertia OR Like Motors, TO Machines OR Engines FOR Liquids Covered BY Subclasses F03b, F03d AND F03g 1

Top 9 of 9 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Koninklijke BAM Groep N.V.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Koninklijke BAM Groep N.V.'s lead technology class is E02B (Hydraulic Engineering), 60% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore E02B
Ranked #48,206 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Koninklijke BAM Groep N.V. against Koite Health Oy, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 31.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.