Kobil Systems GmbH
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Kobil ranks #48,194 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 6 technology areas.
- #48,194
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 23rd percentile
- by Innovation Score (27.3/100)
- 20.8
- avg claims per patent
- -33%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R48194 · Foreign Corporation #48,194 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #48,194/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH KNR System
- CPC-NARROW H04L · 6 areas
- INNOV-THIN 27.3/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 20.8 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DOWN -33% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: KNR System, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Kobil’s 27.3 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Kobil
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Kobil Systems · this assignee 27
Kobil Systems · this assignee
27 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Kobil's Innovation Score is 27.3/100 (23rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Kobil?
Each dot is one of Kobil’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Kobil’s own 20.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 12.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Kobil's grants concentrate
Kobil Systems GmbH is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 80% of grants classified under H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Kobil sits between KNR System, Inc. and Kokusan Denki Co., Ltd..
Who files at Kobil's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- KNR System
KNR System, Inc.
5 patents
- KNS Precision
KNS Precision, Inc.
5 patents
- Knud Jepsen A/S
Knud Jepsen A/S
5 patents
- Koatsu
Koatsu Co., Ltd.
5 patents
- Koch Pac-systeme
Koch Pac-systeme GMBH
5 patents
- Koenigsegg Automo…
Koenigsegg Automotive AB
5 patents
- KOK & VAN Engelen…
KOK & VAN Engelen Composite Structures B.V.
5 patents
- Kokusan Denki
Kokusan Denki Co., Ltd.
5 patents
- Kobil Systems ◀
Kobil Systems GmbH
5 patents
What this shows Kobil holds 5 patents at rank #48,128, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Kobil
By rank, the assignees closest to #48,128 in granted patent volume.
- KNR System, Inc. #48,124 · 5 patents
- KNS Precision, Inc. #48,125 · 5 patents
- Knud Jepsen A/S #48,126 · 5 patents
- Koatsu Co., Ltd. #48,127 · 5 patents
- Koch Pac-systeme GMBH #48,129 · 5 patents
- Koenigsegg Automotive AB #48,130 · 5 patents
- KOK & VAN Engelen Composite Structures B.V. #48,131 · 5 patents
- Kokusan Denki Co., Ltd. #48,132 · 5 patents
Leaders in H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Kobil's primary technology class.
- International Business Machines Corporation 15,969 in class
- Qualcomm Incorporated 13,594 in class
- Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. 11,697 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 10,543 in class
- LG Electronics Inc. 9,062 in class
- Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) 8,543 in class
- Cisco Technology, Inc. 7,502 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 7,301 in class
Kobil's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
27 23rd percentile higher than 23% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2018 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2020 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2021 | 1 | 20.0% |
Which technologies does Kobil Systems GmbH patent most?
Top 6 of 6 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Kobil Systems GmbH's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Kobil Systems GmbH's lead technology class is H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication), 80% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04L
- Ranked #48,194 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Kobil Systems GmbH against KNR System, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 27.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.