Overall rank by patents
#48,047
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 1 technology areas, active 2016–2017. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: A63H (TOYS, e.g. TOPS, DOLLS, HOOPS OR BUILDING BLOCKS).
The verdict
K'nex holds 5 US patents across 1 technology areas, rank #48,047 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
K'nex Limited Partnership Group has been granted 5 US utility patents between 2016 and 2017, placing K'nex Limited Partnership Group at rank #48,047 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 1 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 3.0 claims per patent with primary concentration in A63H (TOYS, e.g. TOPS, DOLLS, HOOPS OR BUILDING BLOCKS). As a US Corporation, K'nex Limited Partnership Group is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, K'nex sits between Just, Inc. (5 patents, rank #48,043) and K.d.w. Company Limited (5 patents, rank #48,051) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 11.5/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 0 grants, compared with 5 in the 2015–2019 window, a -100% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. K'nex Limited Partnership Group's 3.0 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while specialization in 1 subclass reflects a tightly scoped invention area. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark K'nex Limited Partnership Group against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Just, Inc.
5 patents
K FRESH CO., LTD
5 patents
K Laser Technology, Inc.
5 patents
K&W TOOLS CO., LTD.
5 patents
K-LAB Corp.
5 patents
K. EKLUND INNOVATION
5 patents
K. Hartwell Oy Ab
5 patents
K.D.W. Company Limited
5 patents
K'NEX Limited Partnership Group
5 patents
What this shows K'nex holds 5 patents at rank #48,047, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #48,047 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in K'nex's primary technology class.
K'nex's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
12 Top 98% higher than 2% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 4 | 80.0% |
| 2017 | 1 | 20.0% |
Top 1 of 1 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#48,047
Across all tracked assignees
11.5 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
K'nex's 5 grants land it in the top 98% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.