Where does Kinetic River Corp. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Kinetic River Corp. ranks #13,008 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Kinetic River Corp. hold?

Kinetic River Corp. holds 23 US utility patents granted between 2017 and 2025, spanning 1 technology areas.

What is Kinetic River Corp.'s Innovation Score?

Kinetic River Corp. has an Innovation Score of 36.9 out of 100 (top 45% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Kinetic River Corp. focus on?

Kinetic River Corp.'s top technology area is G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties) with 23 patents, ranking #649 of 7,863 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 1 CPC subclasses total.

Is Kinetic River Corp.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Kinetic River Corp.'s recent grant velocity is +114% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Kinetic River Corp.'s patents?

Kinetic River Corp.'s patents average 18.8 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Kinetic River Corp. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Kinetic River Corp.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 23 granted patents across 1 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Kinetic ranks #13,008 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 23 patents across 1 technology areas.

#13,008
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 45%
by Innovation Score (36.9/100): 18.8
avg claims per patent: +114%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R13008 · US Corporation #13,008 · 23 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 23 grants
MID-PACK #13,008/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Kennametal India
CPC-NARROW G01N · 1 areas
INNOV-THIN 36.9/100
CLAIMS-RICH 18.8 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +114% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Kennametal India Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Kinetic’s 36.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 11.0 pts (30%) Velocity 11.1 pts (30%) Breadth 3.5 pts (9%) Claim depth 11.3 pts (31%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Kinetic River · this assignee

37
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Kinetic's Innovation Score is 36.9/100 (top 45% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Kinetic?

Each dot is one of Kinetic’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Kinetic’s own 18.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.7 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Kinetic vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Kinetic's grants concentrate

Kinetic River Corp. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 1 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Kinetic sits between KSM Castings Group GmbH and Københavns Universitet.

Kinetic's three-year grant acceleration

Kinetic River Corp. shows 10 grants in 2022–2024 against only 6 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

KSM Castings Group

23
Kuhn North America

23
Kennametal India

23
Khoros

23
Kinetic Internati…

23
Kraco Enterprises

23
Kverneland Group…

23
Københavns Univer…

23
Kinetic River ◀

23

What this shows Kinetic holds 23 patents at rank #13,007, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Kinetic

By rank, the assignees closest to #13,007 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their…)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Kinetic's primary technology class.

Kinetic's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

37 Top 45% higher than 55% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2017–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Kinetic River Corp. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2017	4	17.4%
2018	2	8.7%
2019	1	4.3%
2020	2	8.7%
2021	3	13.0%
2022	3	13.0%
2023	5	21.7%
2024	2	8.7%
2025partial year	1	4.3%

Which technologies does Kinetic River Corp. patent most?

G01N - Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties 23

Top 1 of 1 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Kinetic River Corp.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Kinetic River Corp.'s lead technology class is G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G01N
Ranked #13,008 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Kinetic River Corp. against KSM Castings Group GmbH, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 36.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.