Kinekt Design LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 14 granted patents across 1 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A44C (Personal Adornments, e.g. JEWELLERY; Coins).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Kinekt ranks #19,979 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 14 patents across 1 technology areas.
- #19,979
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 7th percentile
- by Innovation Score (20.6/100)
- 1.8
- avg claims per patent
- -14%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R19979 · US Corporation #19,979 · 14 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 14 grants
- MID-PACK #19,979/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Kaunas University…
- CPC-NARROW A44C · 1 areas
- INNOV-THIN 20.6/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.8 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DOWN -14% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Kaunas University of Technology (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Kinekt’s 20.6 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Kinekt
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Kinekt Design · this assignee 21
Kinekt Design · this assignee
21 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Kinekt's Innovation Score is 20.6/100 (7th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Kinekt?
Each dot is one of Kinekt’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Kinekt’s own 1.8 claims/patent is at or below the 14.6 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Kinekt's grants concentrate
Kinekt Design LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 1 CPC subclasses with 7.1% of grants classified under A44C (Personal Adornments, e.g. JEWELLERY; Coins). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Kinekt sits between Kaunas University of Technology and Komatsu America Corp..
Kinekt's three-year grant acceleration
Kinekt Design LLC shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 4 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Kinekt's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Kaunas University…
Kaunas University of Technology
14 patents
- Keith Manufacturi…
Keith Manufacturing Co.
14 patents
- Key Ovation
Key Ovation, LLC
14 patents
- Kidde-fenwal
Kidde-Fenwal, LLC
14 patents
- Kiswe Mobile
Kiswe Mobile Inc.
14 patents
- Knitpro Internati…
KnitPro International
14 patents
- Kolbus & KG
Kolbus GmbH & Co. KG
14 patents
- Komatsu America
Komatsu America Corp.
14 patents
- Kinekt Design ◀
Kinekt Design LLC
14 patents
What this shows Kinekt holds 14 patents at rank #19,986, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Kinekt
By rank, the assignees closest to #19,986 in granted patent volume.
- Kaunas University of Technology #19,982 · 14 patents
- Keith Manufacturing Co. #19,983 · 14 patents
- Key Ovation, LLC #19,984 · 14 patents
- Kidde-Fenwal, LLC #19,985 · 14 patents
- Kiswe Mobile Inc. #19,987 · 14 patents
- KnitPro International #19,988 · 14 patents
- Kolbus GmbH & Co. KG #19,989 · 14 patents
- Komatsu America Corp. #19,990 · 14 patents
Leaders in A44C (Personal Adornments)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Kinekt's primary technology class.
Kinekt's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
21 7th percentile higher than 7% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 3 | 21.4% |
| 2016 | 1 | 7.1% |
| 2018 | 1 | 7.1% |
| 2019 | 2 | 14.3% |
| 2020 | 2 | 14.3% |
| 2024 | 4 | 28.6% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 7.1% |
Which technologies does Kinekt Design LLC patent most?
Top 1 of 1 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Kinekt Design LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Kinekt Design LLC's lead technology class is A44C (Personal Adornments, e.g. JEWELLERY; Coins), 7.1% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A44C
- Ranked #19,979 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Kinekt Design LLC against Kaunas University of Technology, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 20.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.