KIK Interactive Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 10 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, KIK ranks #26,675 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 10 patents across 7 technology areas.
- #26,675
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 23rd percentile
- by Innovation Score (27.1/100)
- 15.8
- avg claims per patent
- -57%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R26675 · Foreign Corporation #26,675 · 10 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 10 grants
- MID-PACK #26,675/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Kern
- CPC-NARROW H04L · 7 areas
- INNOV-THIN 27.1/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 15.8 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -57% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Kern AG (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How KIK’s 27.1 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around KIK
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- KIK Interactive · this assignee 27
KIK Interactive · this assignee
27 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows KIK's Innovation Score is 27.1/100 (23rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for KIK?
Each dot is one of KIK’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). KIK’s own 15.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 12.7 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where KIK's grants concentrate
KIK Interactive Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 80% of grants classified under H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, KIK sits between Kern AG and Kinoo, Inc..
Who files at KIK's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Kern
Kern AG
10 patents
- Kettering Univers…
Kettering University
10 patents
- Kettler Internati…
Kettler International, Inc.
10 patents
- Kidde Fire Protec…
Kidde Fire Protection, LLC
10 patents
- King LAI Hygienic…
King LAI Hygienic Materials Co., Ltd
10 patents
- King's Flair Mark…
King's Flair Marketing Limited
10 patents
- Kingsand Machinery
Kingsand Machinery Ltd.
10 patents
- Kinoo
Kinoo, Inc.
10 patents
- KIK Interactive ◀
KIK Interactive Inc.
10 patents
What this shows KIK holds 10 patents at rank #26,659, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near KIK
By rank, the assignees closest to #26,659 in granted patent volume.
- Kern AG #26,655 · 10 patents
- Kettering University #26,656 · 10 patents
- Kettler International, Inc. #26,657 · 10 patents
- Kidde Fire Protection, LLC #26,658 · 10 patents
- King LAI Hygienic Materials Co., Ltd #26,660 · 10 patents
- King's Flair Marketing Limited #26,661 · 10 patents
- Kingsand Machinery Ltd. #26,662 · 10 patents
- Kinoo, Inc. #26,663 · 10 patents
Leaders in H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in KIK's primary technology class.
- International Business Machines Corporation 15,969 in class
- Qualcomm Incorporated 13,594 in class
- Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. 11,697 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 10,543 in class
- LG Electronics Inc. 9,062 in class
- Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) 8,543 in class
- Cisco Technology, Inc. 7,502 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 7,301 in class
KIK's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
27 23rd percentile higher than 23% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2017 | 2 | 20.0% |
| 2018 | 2 | 20.0% |
| 2019 | 2 | 20.0% |
| 2020 | 2 | 20.0% |
| 2021 | 1 | 10.0% |
Which technologies does KIK Interactive Inc. patent most?
Top 7 of 7 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
KIK Interactive Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- KIK Interactive Inc.'s lead technology class is H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication), 80% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04L
- Ranked #26,675 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare KIK Interactive Inc. against Kern AG, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 27.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.