Kigan Industry Co., Ltd.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2016. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Kigan ranks #48,128 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 0 technology areas.
- #48,128
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 0th percentile
- by Innovation Score (6.8/100)
- 1.0
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R48128 · Foreign Corporation #48,128 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #48,128/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Key Leaves
- CPC-UNK CPC blank
- INNOV-LOW 6.8/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Key Leaves, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Kigan’s 6.8 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Kigan
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
- Kigan Industry · this assignee 7
Kigan Industry · this assignee
7 score
What this shows Kigan's Innovation Score is 6.8/100 (0th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Kigan?
Each dot is one of Kigan’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Kigan’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 13.0 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Kigan's grants concentrate
Kigan Industry Co., Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2016 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Kigan sits between Key Leaves, Inc. and Kinetech LLC.
Who files at Kigan's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Key Leaves
Key Leaves, Inc.
5 patents
- Keyline S p A
Keyline S.p.A.
5 patents
- Keyway Innovation…
Keyway Innovations (Shanghai) Company Limited
5 patents
- Kickstart Interna…
Kickstart International, Inc.
5 patents
- Kiinja
Kiinja Corporation
5 patents
- Kimberly-clark
Kimberly-Clark Inc.
5 patents
- Kimbia
Kimbia, Inc.
5 patents
- Kinetech
Kinetech LLC
5 patents
- Kigan Industry ◀
Kigan Industry Co., Ltd.
5 patents
What this shows Kigan holds 5 patents at rank #48,210, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Kigan
By rank, the assignees closest to #48,210 in granted patent volume.
- Key Leaves, Inc. #48,206 · 5 patents
- Keyline S.p.A. #48,207 · 5 patents
- Keyway Innovations (Shanghai) Company Limited #48,208 · 5 patents
- Kickstart International, Inc. #48,209 · 5 patents
- Kiinja Corporation #48,211 · 5 patents
- Kimberly-Clark Inc. #48,212 · 5 patents
- Kimbia, Inc. #48,213 · 5 patents
- Kinetech LLC #48,214 · 5 patents
Kigan's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
7 0th percentile higher than 0% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2016 | 4 | 80.0% |
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Kigan Industry Co., Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Ranked #48,128 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Kigan Industry Co., Ltd. against Key Leaves, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 6.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.