Where does kickball concepts llc rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), kickball concepts llc ranks #32,242 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does kickball concepts llc hold?

kickball concepts llc holds 8 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2021, spanning 8 technology areas.

What is kickball concepts llc's Innovation Score?

kickball concepts llc has an Innovation Score of 32.6 out of 100 (42nd percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does kickball concepts llc focus on?

kickball concepts llc's top technology area is A47C (CHAIRS; SOFAS; Beds) with 8 patents, ranking #113 of 728 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 8 CPC subclasses total.

Is kickball concepts llc's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

kickball concepts llc's recent grant velocity is +0% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). The company is maintaining or growing its granted-patent output.

What does claim depth mean for kickball concepts llc's patents?

kickball concepts llc's patents average 32.4 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the kickball concepts llc patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

kickball concepts llc

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A47C (CHAIRS; SOFAS; Beds).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, kickball ranks #32,242 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 8 technology areas.

#32,242
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 42nd percentile
by Innovation Score (32.6/100): 32.4
avg claims per patent: +0%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R32242 · US Corporation #32,242 · 8 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
MID-PACK #32,242/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH iBeam Materials
CPC-NARROW A47C · 8 areas
INNOV-THIN 32.6/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 32.4 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-FLAT +0% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: iBeam Materials, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How kickball’s 32.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 7.6 pts (23%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 10.0 pts (31%) Claim depth 15.0 pts (46%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
kickball concepts · this assignee

33
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows kickball's Innovation Score is 32.6/100 (42nd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for kickball?

Each dot is one of kickball’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). kickball’s own 32.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 18.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

kickball vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where kickball's grants concentrate

kickball concepts llc is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under A47C (CHAIRS; SOFAS; Beds). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, kickball sits between iBeam Materials, Inc. and voestalpine Metal Forming GmbH.

ibeam Materials

8
icashe

8
itomography

8
infilm Optoelectr…

8
modl ai Aps

8
onenav

8
thyssenkrupp Fert…

8
voestalpine Metal…

8
kickball concepts ◀

8

What this shows kickball holds 8 patents at rank #34,013, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near kickball

By rank, the assignees closest to #34,013 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A47C (Chairs)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in kickball's primary technology class.

kickball's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

33 42nd percentile higher than 42% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2021

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

kickball concepts llc patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	1	12.5%
2016	1	12.5%
2017	1	12.5%
2018	1	12.5%
2020	2	25.0%
2021	2	25.0%

Which technologies does kickball concepts llc patent most?

A47C - CHAIRS; SOFAS; Beds 8

A47G - Household OR Table Equipment 6

D04B - Knitting 2

D10B - Indexing Scheme Associated With Sublasses OF Section D, Relating TO Textiles 2

A61L - Methods OR Apparatus FOR Sterilising Materials OR Objects IN GENERAL; Disinfection, Sterilisation OR Deodorisation OF AIR; Chemical Aspects OF Bandages, Dressings, Absorbent Pads OR Surgical ARTICLES; Materials FOR Bandages, Dressings, Absorbent Pads OR Surgical Articles 1

A61G - Transport, Personal Conveyances, OR Accommodation Specially Adapted FOR Patients OR Disabled Persons ; Operating Tables OR CHAIRS; Chairs FOR DENTISTRY; Funeral Devices 1

A01N - Preservation OF Bodies OF Humans OR Animals OR Plants OR Parts Thereof ; Biocides, e.g. AS Disinfectants, AS Pesticides OR AS Herbicides ; Pest Repellants OR ATTRACTANTS; Plant Growth Regulators 1

B65D - Containers FOR Storage OR Transport OF Articles OR Materials, e.g. Bags, Barrels, Bottles, Boxes, Cans, Cartons, Crates, Drums, Jars, Tanks, Hoppers, Forwarding CONTAINERS; Accessories, Closures, OR Fittings THEREFOR; Packaging ELEMENTS; Packages 1

Top 8 of 8 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

kickball concepts llc's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

kickball concepts llc's lead technology class is A47C (CHAIRS; SOFAS; Beds), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A47C
Ranked #32,242 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare kickball concepts llc against iBeam Materials, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 32.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.