Kartell S.p.A.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 34 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Kartell ranks #9,294 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 34 patents across 0 technology areas.
- #9,294
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 4th percentile
- by Innovation Score (16.2/100)
- 1.0
- avg claims per patent
- -50%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R9294 · Foreign Corporation #9,294 · 34 grants
GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-SMALL 34 grants
- UPPER-Q #9,294/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Inaeris
- CPC-UNK CPC blank
- INNOV-LOW 16.2/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -50% vel
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Inaeris Technologies, LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Kartell’s 16.2 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Kartell
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Shenzhen Longzhiyuan… · near 16
Shenzhen Longzhiyuan… · near
16 score
- Easyhome Organizatio… · near 16
Easyhome Organizatio… · near
16 score
- Kartell S p A · this assignee 16
Kartell S p A · this assignee
16 score
- SEB · near 16
SEB · near
16 score
- Dicastal North America · near 16
Dicastal North America · near
16 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Kartell's Innovation Score is 16.2/100 (4th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Kartell?
Each dot is one of Kartell’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Kartell’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 16.1 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Kartell's grants concentrate
Kartell S.p.A. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2018 (11 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Kartell sits between Inaeris Technologies, LLC and Kdesign GmbH.
Kartell's three-year grant acceleration
Kartell S.p.A. shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 8 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Kartell's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Inaeris
Inaeris Technologies, LLC
34 patents
- Institut Fur Rund…
Institut Fur Rundfunktechnik GMBH
34 patents
- JMJ Korea
JMJ Korea Co., Ltd.
34 patents
- KA Group
KA Group AG
34 patents
- Koch Agronomic Se…
Koch Agronomic Services, LLC
34 patents
- Kuna Systems
Kuna Systems Corporation
34 patents
- Kyphon Sarl
Kyphon Sarl
34 patents
- Kdesign
Kdesign GmbH
34 patents
- Kartell S p A ◀
Kartell S.p.A.
34 patents
What this shows Kartell holds 34 patents at rank #9,294, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Kartell
By rank, the assignees closest to #9,294 in granted patent volume.
- Inaeris Technologies, LLC #9,290 · 34 patents
- Institut Fur Rundfunktechnik GMBH #9,291 · 34 patents
- JMJ Korea Co., Ltd. #9,292 · 34 patents
- KA Group AG #9,293 · 34 patents
- Koch Agronomic Services, LLC #9,295 · 34 patents
- Kuna Systems Corporation #9,296 · 34 patents
- Kyphon Sarl #9,297 · 34 patents
- Kdesign GmbH #9,298 · 34 patents
Assignees with similar portfolio profiles
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Kartell, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).
Similar innovation score
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (16 here).
Kartell's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
16 4th percentile higher than 4% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 | 5.9% |
| 2016 | 4 | 11.8% |
| 2017 | 1 | 2.9% |
| 2018 | 11 | 32.4% |
| 2019 | 2 | 5.9% |
| 2020 | 6 | 17.6% |
| 2023 | 2 | 5.9% |
| 2024 | 2 | 5.9% |
| 2025partial year | 4 | 11.8% |
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Kartell S.p.A.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Ranked #9,294 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Kartell S.p.A. against Inaeris Technologies, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 16.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.