Kara Technologies Limited
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2022–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B01J (Chemical OR Physical Processes, e.g. Catalysis OR Colloid CHEMISTRY; Their Relevant Apparatus).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Kara ranks #48,070 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 6 technology areas.
- #48,070
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 17%
- by Innovation Score (48.0/100)
- 22.0
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R48070 · Foreign Corporation #48,070 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #48,070/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Kankakee Spikeball
- CPC-NARROW B01J · 6 areas
- INNOV-PAR 48.0/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 22.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- SPAN-YRS 2022–2024 · 3y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Kankakee Spikeball, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Kara’s 48.0 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Kara
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Kara · this assignee
Kara · this assignee
48 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Kara's Innovation Score is 48.0/100 (top 17% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Kara?
Each dot is one of Kara’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Kara’s own 22.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 12.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Kara's grants concentrate
Kara Technologies Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 80% of grants classified under B01J (Chemical OR Physical Processes, e.g. Catalysis OR Colloid CHEMISTRY; Their Relevant Apparatus). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2022. By volume, Kara sits between Kankakee Spikeball, Inc. and Kavo Dental GMBH.
Kara's three-year grant acceleration
Kara Technologies Limited shows 5 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Kara's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Kankakee Spikeball
Kankakee Spikeball, Inc.
5 patents
- Kanken Techno
Kanken Techno Co., Ltd.
5 patents
- Kapik
Kapik Inc.
5 patents
- Kapp Niles & KG
Kapp Niles GMBH & Co. KG
5 patents
- Kari-out
Kari-out LLC
5 patents
- Katlego Systems
Katlego Systems, LLC
5 patents
- Kator
Kator, LLC
5 patents
- Kavo Dental
Kavo Dental GMBH
5 patents
- Kara ◀
Kara Technologies Limited
5 patents
What this shows Kara holds 5 patents at rank #48,066, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Kara
By rank, the assignees closest to #48,066 in granted patent volume.
- Kankakee Spikeball, Inc. #48,062 · 5 patents
- Kanken Techno Co., Ltd. #48,063 · 5 patents
- Kapik Inc. #48,064 · 5 patents
- Kapp Niles GMBH & Co. KG #48,065 · 5 patents
- Kari-out LLC #48,067 · 5 patents
- Katlego Systems, LLC #48,068 · 5 patents
- Kator, LLC #48,069 · 5 patents
- Kavo Dental GMBH #48,070 · 5 patents
Leaders in B01J (Chemical OR Physical Processes)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Kara's primary technology class.
Kara's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
48 Top 17% higher than 83% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2022–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2023 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2024 | 2 | 40.0% |
Which technologies does Kara Technologies Limited patent most?
Top 6 of 6 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Kara Technologies Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Kara Technologies Limited's lead technology class is B01J (Chemical OR Physical Processes, e.g. Catalysis OR Colloid CHEMISTRY; Their Relevant Apparatus), 80% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B01J
- Ranked #48,070 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Kara Technologies Limited against Kankakee Spikeball, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 48.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.