USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

K9 Sport Sack, LLC

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 15 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A45C (PURSES; LUGGAGE; Hand Carried Bags).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, K9 ranks #18,799 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 15 patents across 3 technology areas.

#18,799
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
30th percentile
by Innovation Score (29.2/100)
5.8
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R18799 · US Corporation #18,799 · 15 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

  • GRANTS-MICRO 15 grants
  • MID-PACK #18,799/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Jelli
  • CPC-NARROW A45C · 3 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 29.2/100
  • CLAIMS-SPARSE 5.8 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • SPAN-YRS 2020–2024 · 5y
  • BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Jelli, LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How K9’s 29.2 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around K9

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows K9's Innovation Score is 29.2/100 (30th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for K9?

Each dot is one of K9’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). K9’s own 5.8 claims/patent is at or below the 16.3 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

K9 vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 14.914.91515.1 0510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Jelli, LLC - 15, 20JelliJinda Films Americas LLC - 15, 19.33Jinda Films Ameri…Jostens, Inc. - 15, 8.07JostensK11 Group Limited - 15, 1K11 GroupKB Medical, SA - 15, 16.07KB MedicalKing's Flair Development Ltd. - 15, 16.33King's Flair Deve…Kinik Company - 15, 16.87KinikKinnate Biopharma Inc. - 15, 23.2Kinnate BiopharmaK9 Sport Sack, LLC - 15, 5.8K9 Sport Sack
K9 vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where K9's grants concentrate

K9 Sport Sack, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 33.3% of grants classified under A45C (PURSES; LUGGAGE; Hand Carried Bags). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (4 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2024. By volume, K9 sits between Jelli, LLC and Kinnate Biopharma Inc..

K9's three-year grant acceleration

K9 Sport Sack, LLC shows 9 grants in 2022–2024 against only 6 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at K9's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows K9 holds 15 patents at rank #18,795, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near K9

By rank, the assignees closest to #18,795 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A45C (Purses)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in K9's primary technology class.

K9's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

29 30th percentile higher than 30% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

1.522.533.544.5 20202021202220232024 2
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2020–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
K9 Sport Sack, LLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2020 3 20.0%
2021 3 20.0%
2022 3 20.0%
2023 4 26.7%
2024 2 13.3%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

K9 Sport Sack, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • K9 Sport Sack, LLC's lead technology class is A45C (PURSES; LUGGAGE; Hand Carried Bags), 33.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A45C
  • Ranked #18,799 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare K9 Sport Sack, LLC against Jelli, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 29.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.