PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Johnson Matthey Process Technologies, Inc

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 9 technology areas, active 2015–2023. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: C10G (CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION ; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GAS).

Explore the portfolio See the ranking
8
Total patents granted
9
CPC technology areas
13.4
Avg claims per patent
+0%
5-year filing velocity

The verdict

Johnson holds 8 US patents across 9 technology areas, rank #32,186 of 50,000 tracked assignees.

#32,186
of 50,000 US assignees by volume
Top 21%
by Innovation Score (46.2/100)
13.4
avg claims per patent
+0%
filing velocity, last 5 yrs

Portfolio overview

Johnson Matthey Process Technologies, Inc has been granted 8 US utility patents between 2015 and 2023, placing Johnson Matthey Process Technologies, Inc at rank #32,186 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 9 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 13.4 claims per patent with primary concentration in C10G (CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION ; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GAS). As a US Corporation, Johnson Matthey Process Technologies, Inc is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Johnson sits between John Evans' Sons, Incorporated (8 patents, rank #32,182) and Juliet Marine Systems, Inc. (8 patents, rank #32,190) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 46.2/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.

Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 4 grants, compared with 4 in the 2015–2019 window, a +0% shift in five-year velocity. Steady filing volume suggests sustained innovation without dramatic pivots. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.

Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Johnson Matthey Process Technologies, Inc's 13.4 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while concentration in 9 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Johnson Matthey Process Technologies, Inc against peers pursuing similar technology classes.

Who files at Johnson's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Johnson holds 8 patents at rank #32,186, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Johnson

By rank, the assignees closest to #32,186 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in C10G (Cracking Hydrocarbon OILS)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Johnson's primary technology class.

Johnson's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

46 Top 21% higher than 79% of 50,000 US assignees

0–10: 687 US assignees (1%). Below this entry. 10–20: 2,527 US assignees (5%). Below this entry. 20–30: 13,162 US assignees (26%). Below this entry. 30–40: 15,294 US assignees (31%). Below this entry. 40–50: 11,491 US assignees (23%). This entry sits in this band. 50–60: 5,058 US assignees (10%). Above this entry. 60–70: 1,537 US assignees (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 234 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 80–90: 10 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 90–100: 0 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0.511.522.533.5 20152016201720222023 3
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2023

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Johnson Matthey Process Technologies, Inc patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 1 12.5%
2016 1 12.5%
2017 2 25.0%
2022 1 12.5%
2023 3 37.5%

Which technologies does Johnson Matthey Process Technologies, Inc patent most?

Top 9 of 9 technology areas

Patent Moat Analysis

Portfolio Volume Light
Tech Breadth Focused
Claim Depth Standard
Velocity Growing

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#32,186

Across all tracked assignees

Innovation Score

46.2 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

Frequently Asked Questions

How many patents does Johnson Matthey Process Technologies, Inc hold?
Johnson Matthey Process Technologies, Inc holds 8 US granted patents filed between 2015 and 2023, spanning 9 technology areas.
What is Johnson Matthey Process Technologies, Inc's Innovation Score?
Johnson Matthey Process Technologies, Inc has an Innovation Score of 46.2 out of 100. This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), filing velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).
What technology areas does Johnson Matthey Process Technologies, Inc focus on?
Johnson Matthey Process Technologies, Inc's top technology area is C10G (CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION ; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES) with 6 patents. The company has filed patents in 9 CPC subclasses total.
Is Johnson Matthey Process Technologies, Inc's patent filing rate increasing or decreasing?
Johnson Matthey Process Technologies, Inc's recent filing velocity is +0% compared to the prior five-year period. The company is maintaining or growing its patent output.
What does claim depth mean for Johnson Matthey Process Technologies, Inc's patents?
Johnson Matthey Process Technologies, Inc's patents average 13.4 claims each. This falls within the standard range, providing solid legal coverage.
How is the Johnson Matthey Process Technologies, Inc patent data sourced?
All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

How to use this portfolio

Johnson's 8 grants land it in the top 21% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.

  • Read that count against the largest US assignees before treating it as dominance - Johnson ranks #32,186 of 50,000. Top 50 holders
  • Most of this portfolio concentrates in C10G - see who else leads that technology area. C10G leaders
  • Check what the four-part Innovation Score actually rewards before comparing it to another company. How the score works

Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent Editorial

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.