USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Isaac Daniel Group, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2016. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Isaac ranks #41,041 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 0 technology areas.

#41,041
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
0th percentile
by Innovation Score (7.3/100)
1.0
avg claims per patent
-100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R41041 · US Corporation #41,041 · 6 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-RICH

  • GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
  • LOWER-Q #41,041/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Ipeco Holdings
  • CPC-UNK CPC blank
  • INNOV-LOW 7.3/100
  • CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DROP -100% vel
  • BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Ipeco Holdings Limited (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Isaac’s 7.3 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Isaac

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Isaac's Innovation Score is 7.3/100 (0th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Isaac?

Each dot is one of Isaac’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Isaac’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 9.7 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Isaac vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 5.96.06.066.06.06.1 0102030 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Ipeco Holdings Limited - 6, 9.67Ipeco HoldingsIqor Holdings Inc. - 6, 21.83Iqor HoldingsIris Automation, Inc. - 6, 17.5Iris AutomationIron Grip Holdings Pty Limited - 6, 6.83Iron Grip Holding…Isaberg Rapid AB - 6, 5.5Isaberg Rapid ABIsoTruss Industries LLC - 6, 8Isotruss Industri…Itamar Medical Spry 2021, Limited Partnership - 6, 22.17Itamar Medical Sp…Ithaca College - 6, 24.67Ithaca CollegeIsaac Daniel Group, Inc. - 6, 1Isaac Daniel Group
Isaac vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Isaac's grants concentrate

Isaac Daniel Group, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2016 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Isaac sits between Ipeco Holdings Limited and Ithaca College.

Who files at Isaac's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Isaac holds 6 patents at rank #41,036, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Isaac

By rank, the assignees closest to #41,036 in granted patent volume.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Isaac, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).

Isaac's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

7 0th percentile higher than 0% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0123456 20152016 5
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2016

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Isaac Daniel Group, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 1 16.7%
2016 5 83.3%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Isaac Daniel Group, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Ranked #41,041 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Isaac Daniel Group, Inc. against Ipeco Holdings Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 7.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.