Iriver Limited
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 13 granted patents across 1 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04B (Transmission).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Iriver ranks #21,294 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 13 patents across 1 technology areas.
- #21,294
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 2nd percentile
- by Innovation Score (13.9/100)
- 2.1
- avg claims per patent
- -70%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R21294 · Foreign Corporation #21,294 · 13 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 13 grants
- MID-PACK #21,294/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Intima Bioscience
- CPC-NARROW H04B · 1 areas
- INNOV-LOW 13.9/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 2.1 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -70% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Intima Bioscience, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Iriver’s 13.9 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Iriver
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Iriver · this assignee 14
Iriver · this assignee
14 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Iriver's Innovation Score is 13.9/100 (2nd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Iriver?
Each dot is one of Iriver’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Iriver’s own 2.1 claims/patent is at or below the 9.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Iriver's grants concentrate
Iriver Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 1 CPC subclasses with 7.7% of grants classified under H04B (Transmission). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (5 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2016. By volume, Iriver sits between Intima Bioscience, Inc. and Iwaki Co., Ltd..
Who files at Iriver's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Intima Bioscience
Intima Bioscience, Inc.
13 patents
- Intwine Connect
Intwine Connect, LLC
13 patents
- Invanti(Beijing)T…
INVANTI(BEIJING)TECHNOLOGY Co., Ltd.
13 patents
- Ipevo
Ipevo Corp.
13 patents
- Ishihara Chemical
Ishihara Chemical Co., Ltd.
13 patents
- Isteq Group Holdi…
Isteq Group Holding B.V.
13 patents
- Italdesign Giugia…
Italdesign Giugiaro S.P.A.
13 patents
- Iwaki
Iwaki Co., Ltd.
13 patents
- Iriver ◀
Iriver Limited
13 patents
What this shows Iriver holds 13 patents at rank #21,273, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Iriver
By rank, the assignees closest to #21,273 in granted patent volume.
- Intima Bioscience, Inc. #21,269 · 13 patents
- Intwine Connect, LLC #21,270 · 13 patents
- INVANTI(BEIJING)TECHNOLOGY Co., Ltd. #21,271 · 13 patents
- Ipevo Corp. #21,272 · 13 patents
- Ishihara Chemical Co., Ltd. #21,274 · 13 patents
- Isteq Group Holding B.V. #21,275 · 13 patents
- Italdesign Giugiaro S.P.A. #21,276 · 13 patents
- Iwaki Co., Ltd. #21,277 · 13 patents
Leaders in H04B (Transmission)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Iriver's primary technology class.
- Qualcomm Incorporated 6,670 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 4,632 in class
- LG Electronics Inc. 3,654 in class
- Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. 3,555 in class
- Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) 3,146 in class
- Apple Inc. 2,286 in class
- Intel Corporation 1,705 in class
- Sony Group Corporation 1,475 in class
Iriver's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
14 2nd percentile higher than 2% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2 | 15.4% |
| 2017 | 3 | 23.1% |
| 2018 | 5 | 38.5% |
| 2020 | 3 | 23.1% |
Which technologies does Iriver Limited patent most?
Top 1 of 1 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Iriver Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Iriver Limited's lead technology class is H04B (Transmission), 7.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04B
- Ranked #21,294 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Iriver Limited against Intima Bioscience, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 13.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.