IPS, CORPORATION—WELD-ON Division
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F16L (PIPES; Joints OR Fittings FOR PIPES; Supports FOR Pipes, Cables OR Protective TUBING; Means FOR Thermal Insulation IN General).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, IPS ranks #47,851 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 4 technology areas.
- #47,851
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 39%
- by Innovation Score (39.2/100)
- 21.0
- avg claims per patent
- +0%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R47851 · US Corporation #47,851 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #47,851/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH IPN IP BV
- CPC-NARROW F16L · 4 areas
- INNOV-THIN 39.2/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 21.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-FLAT +0% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: IPN IP BV (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How IPS’s 39.2 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around IPS
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- IPS —WELD-ON Division · this assignee
IPS —WELD-ON Division · this assignee
39 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows IPS's Innovation Score is 39.2/100 (top 39% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for IPS?
Each dot is one of IPS’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). IPS’s own 21.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where IPS's grants concentrate
IPS, CORPORATION—WELD-ON Division is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 80% of grants classified under F16L (PIPES; Joints OR Fittings FOR PIPES; Supports FOR Pipes, Cables OR Protective TUBING; Means FOR Thermal Insulation IN General). Peak complete grant year is 2022 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, IPS sits between IPN IP BV and Iritech, Inc..
IPS's three-year grant acceleration
IPS, CORPORATION—WELD-ON Division shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at IPS's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- IPN IP BV
IPN IP BV
5 patents
- Ipquants
Ipquants Limited
5 patents
- Iprasense SAS
Iprasense SAS
5 patents
- Ipreo
Ipreo LLC
5 patents
- IQB Information
IQB Information Technologies Inc.
5 patents
- IQS Group s r o
IQS Group s.r.o.
5 patents
- Iris Tech
Iris Tech, Inc.
5 patents
- Iritech
Iritech, Inc.
5 patents
- IPS —Weld-on Divi… ◀
IPS, CORPORATION—WELD-ON Division
5 patents
What this shows IPS holds 5 patents at rank #47,722, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near IPS
By rank, the assignees closest to #47,722 in granted patent volume.
Leaders in F16L (Pipes)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in IPS's primary technology class.
- Saudi Arabian OIL Company 154 in class
- Vallourec OIL AND GAS France 122 in class
- Mueller International, LLC 111 in class
- Nippon Steel Corporation 99 in class
- Whirlpool Corporation 92 in class
- Eaton Intelligent Power Limited 84 in class
- Airbus Operations Limited 77 in class
- Victaulic Company 77 in class
IPS's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
39 Top 39% higher than 61% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2019 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2022 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 20.0% |
Which technologies does IPS, CORPORATION—WELD-ON Division patent most?
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
IPS, CORPORATION—WELD-ON Division's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- IPS, CORPORATION—WELD-ON Division's lead technology class is F16L (PIPES; Joints OR Fittings FOR PIPES; Supports FOR Pipes, Cables OR Protective TUBING; Means FOR Thermal Insulation IN General), 80% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F16L
- Ranked #47,851 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare IPS, CORPORATION—WELD-ON Division against IPN IP BV, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 39.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.