IP Trademark Holdings Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2023–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A24C (Machines FOR Making Cigars OR Cigarettes).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, IP ranks #47,842 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 2 technology areas.
- #47,842
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 28%
- by Innovation Score (43.3/100)
- 20.2
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R47842 · US Corporation #47,842 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #47,842/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Iotmemory Technology
- CPC-NARROW A24C · 2 areas
- INNOV-PAR 43.3/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 20.2 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- SPAN-YRS 2023–2025 · 3y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Iotmemory Technology Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How IP’s 43.3 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around IP
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- IP Trademark Holdings · this assignee
IP Trademark Holdings · this assignee
43 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows IP's Innovation Score is 43.3/100 (top 28% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for IP?
Each dot is one of IP’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). IP’s own 20.2 claims/patent is ABOVE the 6.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where IP's grants concentrate
IP Trademark Holdings Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 80% of grants classified under A24C (Machines FOR Making Cigars OR Cigarettes). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2024. By volume, IP sits between Iotmemory Technology Inc. and IPN IP BV.
IP's three-year grant acceleration
IP Trademark Holdings Inc. shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at IP's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Iotmemory Technol…
Iotmemory Technology Inc.
5 patents
- IP Assets
IP Assets LLC
5 patents
- IP File Worldwide
IP File Worldwide Ltd
5 patents
- IP Mill Holdings
IP Mill Holdings LLC
5 patents
- Ipee
Ipee NV
5 patents
- IPI Tech
IPI Tech Inc.
5 patents
- IPL Plastics
IPL Plastics Inc.
5 patents
- IPN IP BV
IPN IP BV
5 patents
- IP Trademark Hold… ◀
IP Trademark Holdings Inc.
5 patents
What this shows IP holds 5 patents at rank #47,714, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near IP
By rank, the assignees closest to #47,714 in granted patent volume.
Leaders in A24C (Machines FOR Making Cigars OR Cigarettes)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in IP's primary technology class.
- Philip Morris Products S.A. 145 in class
- Altria Client Services LLC 57 in class
- International Tobacco Machinery Poland Sp. z o.o. 44 in class
- R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company 42 in class
- Blunt Wrap U.S.A., Inc. 28 in class
- Japan Tobacco Inc. 26 in class
- British American Tobacco (Investments) Limited 26 in class
- G.D S.P.A. 26 in class
IP's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
43 Top 28% higher than 72% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2023–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2024 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2025partial year | 2 | 40.0% |
Which technologies does IP Trademark Holdings Inc. patent most?
Top 2 of 2 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
IP Trademark Holdings Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- IP Trademark Holdings Inc.'s lead technology class is A24C (Machines FOR Making Cigars OR Cigarettes), 80% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A24C
- Ranked #47,842 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare IP Trademark Holdings Inc. against Iotmemory Technology Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 43.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.