Overall rank by patents
#26,553
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 10 granted patents across 5 technology areas, active 2018–2021. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: C07D (HETEROCYCLIC COMPOUNDS).
The verdict
Iomet holds 10 US patents across 5 technology areas, rank #26,553 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Iomet Pharma Ltd. has been granted 10 US utility patents between 2018 and 2021, placing Iomet Pharma Ltd. at rank #26,553 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 5 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 12.7 claims per patent with primary concentration in C07D (HETEROCYCLIC COMPOUNDS). As a Foreign Corporation, Iomet Pharma Ltd. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Iomet sits between INX International Ink Co. (10 patents, rank #26,549) and Irresistible Materials Ltd (10 patents, rank #26,557) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 23.8/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 3 grants, compared with 7 in the 2015–2019 window, a -57% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Iomet Pharma Ltd.'s 12.7 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while concentration in 5 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Iomet Pharma Ltd. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
INX International Ink Co.
10 patents
INZER ADVANCE DESIGNS, INC.
10 patents
IOENGINE, LLC
10 patents
ION BEAM SERVICES
10 patents
IP POWER HOLDINGS LIMITED
10 patents
IPC SYSTEMS, INC.
10 patents
IQOR US Inc.
10 patents
IRRESISTIBLE MATERIALS LTD
10 patents
IOmet Pharma Ltd.
10 patents
What this shows Iomet holds 10 patents at rank #26,553, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Iomet's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
24 Top 87% higher than 13% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 3 | 30.0% |
| 2019 | 4 | 40.0% |
| 2020 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2021 | 2 | 20.0% |
Top 5 of 5 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#26,553
Across all tracked assignees
23.8 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Iomet's 10 grants land it in the top 87% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.