Overall rank by patents
#24,574
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 11 technology areas, active 2015–2016. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: C09K (MATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE).
The verdict
Intevep holds 11 US patents across 11 technology areas, rank #24,574 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Intevep, S.a. has been granted 11 US utility patents between 2015 and 2016, placing Intevep, S.a. at rank #24,574 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 11 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 17.2 claims per patent with primary concentration in C09K (MATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE). As a Foreign Corporation, Intevep, S.a. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Intevep sits between Intelligent Virus Imaging Inc. (11 patents, rank #24,570) and Ioxus, Inc. (11 patents, rank #24,578) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 30.6/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 0 grants, compared with 11 in the 2015–2019 window, a -100% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Intevep, S.a.'s 17.2 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while concentration in 11 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Intevep, S.a. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Intelligent Virus Imaging Inc.
11 patents
International Spinal Innovations, LLC
11 patents
International Stem Cell Corporation
11 patents
International Textile Group, Inc.
11 patents
Intuition Robotics, Ltd.
11 patents
Investigacion y Tecnologia de Uva de Mesa S.L.
11 patents
Invicta Medical, Inc.
11 patents
Ioxus, Inc.
11 patents
Intevep, S.A.
11 patents
What this shows Intevep holds 11 patents at rank #24,574, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Intevep's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
31 Top 65% higher than 35% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 10 | 90.9% |
| 2016 | 1 | 9.1% |
Top 11 of 11 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#24,574
Across all tracked assignees
30.6 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Intevep's 11 grants land it in the top 65% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.