Overall rank by patents
#47,693
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 2 technology areas, active 2018–2024. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: G06F (ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING).
The verdict
Interject holds 5 US patents across 2 technology areas, rank #47,693 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Interject DATA System, Inc. has been granted 5 US utility patents between 2018 and 2024, placing Interject DATA System, Inc. at rank #47,693 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 2 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 17.4 claims per patent with primary concentration in G06F (ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING). As a US Corporation, Interject DATA System, Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Interject sits between Interactif Visuel Systeme (i V S) (5 patents, rank #47,689) and Inteva Products France SAS (5 patents, rank #47,697) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 41.6/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 4 grants, compared with 1 in the 2015–2019 window, a +300% shift in five-year velocity. An acceleration of this magnitude signals aggressive R&D investment and expanding technical ambition. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Interject DATA System, Inc.'s 17.4 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while specialization in 2 subclasses reflects a tightly scoped invention area. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Interject DATA System, Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
INTERACTIF VISUEL SYSTEME (I V S)
5 patents
INTERACTIVE SKIN, INC.
5 patents
INTERACTIVE SPORTS TECHNOLOGIES INC.
5 patents
INTERFACE FLUIDICS LTD.
5 patents
INTERVACC AB
5 patents
INTERWORK KOREA CO., LTD.
5 patents
INTEVA PRODUCTS EUROPE GMBH
5 patents
INTEVA PRODUCTS FRANCE SAS
5 patents
INTERJECT DATA SYSTEM, INC.
5 patents
What this shows Interject holds 5 patents at rank #47,693, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #47,693 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Interject's primary technology class.
Interject's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
42 Top 33% higher than 67% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2021 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2022 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2023 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2024 | 1 | 20.0% |
Top 2 of 2 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#47,693
Across all tracked assignees
41.6 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Interject's 5 grants land it in the top 33% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.