Overall rank by patents
#5,847
of 50,000 tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 58 granted patents across 62 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: Y02E (REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Institute ranks #5,847 of 50,000 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 58 patents across 62 technology areas.
Institute Of Chemistry Chinese Academy Of Sciences has been granted 58 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing Institute Of Chemistry Chinese Academy Of Sciences at #5,847 of 50,000 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 62 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 11.8 claims per patent with primary concentration in Y02E (REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION). As a Foreign Corporation, Institute Of Chemistry Chinese Academy Of Sciences is one of the broader-portfolio assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Institute sits between Genia Technologies, Inc. (58 patents, rank #5,843) and KEY Safety Systems, Inc. (58 patents, rank #5,851) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 56.2/100 blends portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Grant cadence records the difference between two grant-year windows. Between 2020 and 2024 the company received 34 grants, compared with 21 in the 2015–2019 window, a +62% shift in five-year grant velocity. Both windows cover five complete grant years; the latest PatentsView year is a partial release and is excluded from this comparison, though it still appears in the yearly table and chart below. Grant timing can lag the related application by years, so this comparison does not establish current R&D spending, strategic intent, or a company’s application activity. The Foreign Corporation classification provides context for the assignee record, not a conclusion about its business strategy.
Claim depth and technology breadth describe this aggregate record. Institute Of Chemistry Chinese Academy Of Sciences's 11.8 average claims per patent is an average count, not a measure of claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk. The record spans 62 CPC subclasses. Combined with portfolio volume, these figures let readers compare the documented grant records of assignees in similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Genia Technologies, Inc.
58 patents
Gilbarco Inc.
58 patents
HORIZON HOBBY, LLC
58 patents
Institute for Cancer Research
58 patents
Intellijoint Surgical Inc.
58 patents
JD.com American Technologies Corporation
58 patents
JIANGSU MIDEA CLEANING APPLIANCES CO., LTD.
58 patents
KEY SAFETY SYSTEMS, INC.
58 patents
Institute of Chemistry Chinese Academy of Sciences
58 patents
What this shows Institute holds 58 patents at rank #5,847, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #5,847 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Institute's primary technology class.
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Institute, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (56 here).
Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (11.8 here).
Institute's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
56 Top 6% higher than 94% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 5 | 8.6% |
| 2016 | 4 | 6.9% |
| 2017 | 3 | 5.2% |
| 2018 | 3 | 5.2% |
| 2019 | 6 | 10.3% |
| 2020 | 7 | 12.1% |
| 2021 | 3 | 5.2% |
| 2022 | 16 | 27.6% |
| 2023 | 5 | 8.6% |
| 2024 | 3 | 5.2% |
| 2025partial year | 3 | 5.2% |
Top 15 of 62 technology areas
Historical grant data only; it does not rate legal strength or current strategy.
Overall rank by patents
#5,847
of 50,000 tracked assignees
56.2 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Institute's 58 grants land it in the top 6% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.