Inno Instrument (CHINA) Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 23 granted patents across 14 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G02B (Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Inno ranks #12,984 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 23 patents across 14 technology areas.
- #12,984
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 30th percentile
- by Innovation Score (29.4/100)
- 8.6
- avg claims per patent
- -79%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R12984 · Foreign Corporation #12,984 · 23 grants
GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-SMALL 23 grants
- MID-PACK #12,984/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Ichikawa
- CPC-FOCUS G02B · 14 areas
- INNOV-THIN 29.4/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 8.6 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -79% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Ichikawa Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Inno’s 29.4 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Inno
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Inno Instrument… · this assignee 29
Inno Instrument… · this assignee
29 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Inno's Innovation Score is 29.4/100 (30th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Inno?
Each dot is one of Inno’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Inno’s own 8.6 claims/patent is at or below the 13.0 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Inno's grants concentrate
Inno Instrument (CHINA) Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 14 CPC subclasses with 56.5% of grants classified under G02B (Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (11 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Inno sits between Ichikawa Co., Ltd. and ITM Semiconductor Co., Ltd..
Who files at Inno's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Ichikawa
Ichikawa Co., Ltd.
23 patents
- IEX Group
IEX Group, Inc.
23 patents
- Imagekeeper
Imagekeeper LLC
23 patents
- IMS Nanofabricati…
IMS Nanofabrication GmbH
23 patents
- Innovaction
Innovaction Technologies
23 patents
- Institute OF Comp…
Institute OF Computing Technology, Chinese Academy OF Sciences
23 patents
- ITC
ITC Inc.
23 patents
- ITM Semiconductor
ITM Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
23 patents
- Inno Instrument (… ◀
Inno Instrument (CHINA) Inc.
23 patents
What this shows Inno holds 23 patents at rank #12,978, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Inno
By rank, the assignees closest to #12,978 in granted patent volume.
- Ichikawa Co., Ltd. #12,974 · 23 patents
- IEX Group, Inc. #12,975 · 23 patents
- Imagekeeper LLC #12,976 · 23 patents
- IMS Nanofabrication GmbH #12,977 · 23 patents
- Innovaction Technologies #12,979 · 23 patents
- Institute OF Computing Technology, Chinese Academy OF Sciences #12,980 · 23 patents
- ITC Inc. #12,981 · 23 patents
- ITM Semiconductor Co., Ltd. #12,982 · 23 patents
Leaders in G02B (Optical Elements)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Inno's primary technology class.
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 4,608 in class
- Canon Kabushiki Kaisha 2,525 in class
- Fujifilm Corporation 2,173 in class
- BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. 1,899 in class
- Olympus Corporation 1,893 in class
- Sony Group Corporation 1,572 in class
- Apple Inc. 1,367 in class
- Seiko Epson Corporation 1,332 in class
Inno's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
29 30th percentile higher than 30% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 4.3% |
| 2017 | 11 | 47.8% |
| 2018 | 4 | 17.4% |
| 2019 | 3 | 13.0% |
| 2020 | 4 | 17.4% |
Which technologies does Inno Instrument (CHINA) Inc. patent most?
Top 14 of 14 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Inno Instrument (CHINA) Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Inno Instrument (CHINA) Inc.'s lead technology class is G02B (Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus), 56.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G02B
- Ranked #12,984 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Inno Instrument (CHINA) Inc. against Ichikawa Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 29.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.