Where does Inkbed, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Inkbed, Inc. ranks #17,780 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Inkbed, Inc. hold?

Inkbed, Inc. holds 16 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 4 technology areas.

What is Inkbed, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Inkbed, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 33.5 out of 100 (45th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Inkbed, Inc. focus on?

Inkbed, Inc.'s top technology area is A47C (CHAIRS; SOFAS; Beds) with 16 patents, ranking #44 of 728 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 4 CPC subclasses total.

Is Inkbed, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Inkbed, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +0% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). The company is maintaining or growing its granted-patent output.

What does claim depth mean for Inkbed, Inc.'s patents?

Inkbed, Inc.'s patents average 23.1 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Inkbed, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Inkbed, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 16 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A47C (CHAIRS; SOFAS; Beds).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Inkbed ranks #17,780 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 16 patents across 4 technology areas.

#17,780
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 45th percentile
by Innovation Score (33.5/100): 23.1
avg claims per patent: +0%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R17780 · US Corporation #17,780 · 16 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 16 grants
MID-PACK #17,780/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Industry Academic…
CPC-NARROW A47C · 4 areas
INNOV-THIN 33.5/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 23.1 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-FLAT +0% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Industry Academic Cooperation Foundation, Hallym University (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Inkbed’s 33.5 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 9.8 pts (29%) Velocity 2.9 pts (9%) Breadth 7.1 pts (21%) Claim depth 13.8 pts (41%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Inkbed · this assignee

34
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Inkbed's Innovation Score is 33.5/100 (45th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Inkbed?

Each dot is one of Inkbed’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Inkbed’s own 23.1 claims/patent is ABOVE the 10.7 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Inkbed vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Inkbed's grants concentrate

Inkbed, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under A47C (CHAIRS; SOFAS; Beds). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Inkbed sits between Industry Academic Cooperation Foundation, Hallym University and Intrinsic ID B.V..

Inkbed's three-year grant acceleration

Inkbed, Inc. shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 7 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Industry Academic…

16
Infastech Intelle…

16
INI Power Systems

16
Inis Biotech

16
Insectergy

16
Institut Regional…

16
Intermetallics

16
Intrinsic ID B V

16
Inkbed ◀

16

What this shows Inkbed holds 16 patents at rank #17,773, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Inkbed

By rank, the assignees closest to #17,773 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A47C (Chairs)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Inkbed's primary technology class.

Inkbed's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

34 45th percentile higher than 45% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Inkbed, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	1	6.3%
2016	2	12.5%
2017	1	6.3%
2019	3	18.8%
2020	2	12.5%
2021	2	12.5%
2022	1	6.3%
2023	2	12.5%
2025partial year	2	12.5%

Which technologies does Inkbed, Inc. patent most?

A47C - CHAIRS; SOFAS; Beds 16

A61B - DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification 9

A61M - Devices FOR Introducing Media Into, OR Onto, THE Body ; Devices FOR Transducing Body Media OR FOR Taking Media From THE Body ; Devices FOR Producing OR Ending Sleep OR Stupor 8

A61G - Transport, Personal Conveyances, OR Accommodation Specially Adapted FOR Patients OR Disabled Persons ; Operating Tables OR CHAIRS; Chairs FOR DENTISTRY; Funeral Devices 8

Top 4 of 4 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Inkbed, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Inkbed, Inc.'s lead technology class is A47C (CHAIRS; SOFAS; Beds), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A47C
Ranked #17,780 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Inkbed, Inc. against Industry Academic Cooperation Foundation, Hallym University, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 33.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.