USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Ingram Micro Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 18 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Ingram ranks #16,106 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 18 patents across 4 technology areas.

#16,106
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
17th percentile
by Innovation Score (25.5/100)
13.7
avg claims per patent
+67%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R16106 · US Corporation #16,106 · 18 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 18 grants
  • MID-PACK #16,106/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Incuvate
  • CPC-NARROW G06F · 4 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 25.5/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 13.7 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-SURGE +67% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Incuvate, LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Ingram’s 25.5 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Ingram

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Ingram's Innovation Score is 25.5/100 (17th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Ingram?

Each dot is one of Ingram’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Ingram’s own 13.7 claims/patent is at or below the 18.1 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Ingram vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 17.917.91818.1 0510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent InEnTec Inc. - 18, 19.56InentecIncuvate, LLC - 18, 21.33IncuvateIndependence Materials Group, LLC - 18, 16.78Independence Mate…Infrared5, Inc. - 18, 19.72Infrared5Innovation U.S.A., Inc. - 18, 2.39Innovation UInnovative Product Brands, Inc. - 18, 8.5Innovative Produc…Integrity Orthopaedics, Inc. - 18, 19.06Integrity Orthopa…Intelleflex Corporation - 18, 18.11IntelleflexIngram Micro Inc. - 18, 13.72Ingram Micro
Ingram vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Ingram's grants concentrate

Ingram Micro Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 72.2% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (7 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Ingram sits between InEnTec Inc. and Intelleflex Corporation.

Who files at Ingram's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Ingram holds 18 patents at rank #16,111, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Ingram

By rank, the assignees closest to #16,111 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Ingram's primary technology class.

Ingram's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

25 17th percentile higher than 17% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

02468 201620182019202020212025 2
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Ingram Micro Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2016 1 5.6%
2018 2 11.1%
2019 3 16.7%
2020 3 16.7%
2021 7 38.9%
2025partial year 2 11.1%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Ingram Micro Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Ingram Micro Inc.'s lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 72.2% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
  • Ranked #16,106 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Ingram Micro Inc. against InEnTec Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 25.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.