Where does Impressions Vanity Company rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Impressions Vanity Company ranks #13,482 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Impressions Vanity Company hold?

Impressions Vanity Company holds 22 US utility patents granted between 2017 and 2023, spanning 0 technology areas.

What is Impressions Vanity Company's Innovation Score?

Impressions Vanity Company has an Innovation Score of 13.5 out of 100 (2nd percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Impressions Vanity Company focus on?

Impressions Vanity Company holds grants across 0 technology areas classified under the Cooperative Patent Classification system.

Is Impressions Vanity Company's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Impressions Vanity Company's recent grant velocity is +167% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Impressions Vanity Company's patents?

Impressions Vanity Company's patents average 1.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Impressions Vanity Company patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Impressions Vanity Company

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 22 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Impressions ranks #13,482 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 22 patents across 0 technology areas.

#13,482
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 2nd percentile
by Innovation Score (13.5/100): 1.0
avg claims per patent: +167%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R13482 · US Corporation #13,482 · 22 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-RICH

GRANTS-SMALL 22 grants
MID-PACK #13,482/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Imasen Electric…
CPC-UNK CPC blank
INNOV-LOW 13.5/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +167% vel
BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Imasen Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Impressions’s 13.5 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 10.8 pts (80%) Velocity 2.1 pts (16%) Breadth 0.0 pts (0%) Claim depth 0.6 pts (4%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Impressions Vanity · this assignee

13
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Impressions's Innovation Score is 13.5/100 (2nd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Impressions?

Each dot is one of Impressions’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Impressions’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 14.1 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Impressions vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Impressions's grants concentrate

Impressions Vanity Company is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2021 (9 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Impressions sits between Inventisbio Co., Ltd. and Inpeco Holding Ltd..

Impressions's three-year grant acceleration

Impressions Vanity Company shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 13 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Inventisbio

22
Inzicontrols

22
Ishida Europe

22
Imasen Electric I…

22
Impulse Dynamics

22
Infortrend Techno…

22
Innovative Office…

22
Inpeco Holding

22
Impressions Vanity ◀

22

What this shows Impressions holds 22 patents at rank #13,486, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Impressions

By rank, the assignees closest to #13,486 in granted patent volume.

Impressions's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

13 2nd percentile higher than 2% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2017–2023

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Impressions Vanity Company patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2017	2	9.1%
2018	3	13.6%
2019	1	4.5%
2020	3	13.6%
2021	9	40.9%
2022	3	13.6%
2023	1	4.5%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Impressions Vanity Company's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Ranked #13,482 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Impressions Vanity Company against Inventisbio Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 13.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.