Where does Impossible Objects, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Impossible Objects, Inc. ranks #9,054 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Impossible Objects, Inc. hold?

Impossible Objects, Inc. holds 35 US utility patents granted between 2016 and 2025, spanning 21 technology areas.

What is Impossible Objects, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Impossible Objects, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 47.4 out of 100 (top 19% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Impossible Objects, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Impossible Objects, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +109% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Impossible Objects, Inc.'s patents?

Impossible Objects, Inc.'s patents average 14.1 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Impossible Objects, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Impossible Objects, Inc.

Q: What technology areas does Impossible Objects, Inc. focus on?

Impossible Objects, Inc.'s top technology area is B33Y (Additive Manufacturing, i.e. Manufacturing OF Three-dimensional [3-D] Objects BY Additive Deposition, Additive Agglomeration OR Additive Layering, e.g. BY 3-D Printing, Stereolithography OR Selective Laser Sintering) with 33 patents, ranking #64 of 1,250 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 21 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 35 granted patents across 21 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B33Y (Additive Manufacturing, i.e. Manufacturing OF Three-dimensional [3-D] Objects BY Additive Deposition, Additive Agglomeration OR Additive Layering, e.g. BY 3-D Printing, Stereolithography OR Selective ).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Impossible ranks #9,054 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 35 patents across 21 technology areas.

#9,054
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 19%
by Innovation Score (47.4/100): 14.1
avg claims per patent: +109%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R9054 · US Corporation #9,054 · 35 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 35 grants
UPPER-Q #9,054/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Innovia Films
CPC-FOCUS B33Y · 21 areas
INNOV-PAR 47.4/100
CLAIMS-RICH 14.1 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +109% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Innovia Films Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Impossible’s 47.4 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 12.4 pts (26%) Velocity 10.3 pts (22%) Breadth 16.2 pts (34%) Claim depth 8.5 pts (18%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Clean Power… · near

47
Electro Industries/G… · near

47
Impossible Objects · this assignee

47
Seegene · near

47
Slayback Pharma · near

47
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Impossible's Innovation Score is 47.4/100 (top 19% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Impossible?

Each dot is one of Impossible’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Impossible’s own 14.1 claims/patent is at or below the 17.0 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Impossible vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Impossible's grants concentrate

Impossible Objects, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 21 CPC subclasses with 94.3% of grants classified under B33Y (Additive Manufacturing, i.e. Manufacturing OF Three-dimensional [3-D] Objects BY Additive Deposition, Additive Agglomeration OR Additive Layering, e.g. BY 3-D Printing, Stereolithography OR Selective ). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (8 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Impossible sits between Innovia Films Ltd. and Joulwatt Technology Co., Ltd..

Impossible's three-year grant acceleration

Impossible Objects, Inc. shows 17 grants in 2022–2024 against only 11 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Innovia Films

35
Inoac

35
Institute OF Semi…

35
Invidi

35
Invention And Col…

35
JCM American

35
Jfrog

35
Joulwatt Technolo…

35
Impossible Objects ◀

35

What this shows Impossible holds 35 patents at rank #9,056, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Impossible

By rank, the assignees closest to #9,056 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B33Y (Additive Manufacturing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Impossible's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Impossible, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In B33Y (Additive Manufacturing), Impossible ranks #64 of 1,250 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (47 here).

Slayback Pharma LLC 47 Seegene, Inc. 47 Electro Industries/Gauge Tech 47 Clean Power Research, L.L.C. 47

Impossible's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

47 Top 19% higher than 81% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Impossible Objects, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2016	2	5.7%
2017	3	8.6%
2018	1	2.9%
2019	5	14.3%
2020	2	5.7%
2021	4	11.4%
2022	3	8.6%
2023	8	22.9%
2024	6	17.1%
2025partial year	1	2.9%

Which technologies does Impossible Objects, Inc. patent most?

B33Y - Additive Manufacturing, i.e. Manufacturing OF Three-dimensional [3-D] Objects BY Additive Deposition, Additive Agglomeration OR Additive Layering, e.g. BY 3-D Printing, Stereolithography OR Selective Laser Sintering 33

B29C - Shaping OR Joining OF PLASTICS; Shaping OF Material IN A Plastic State, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; After-treatment OF THE Shaped Products, e.g. Repairing 33

B32B - Layered Products, i.e. Products Built-up OF Strata OF Flat OR Non-flat, e.g. Cellular OR Honeycomb, Form 14

Y02P - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies IN THE Production OR Processing OF Goods 12

B29K - Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclasses B29b, B29c OR B29d, Relating TO Moulding Materials OR TO Materials FOR ; Moulds, ; Reinforcements, Fillers OR Preformed Parts, e.g. Inserts 11

B22F - Working Metallic POWDER; Manufacture OF Articles From Metallic POWDER; Making Metallic Powder ; Apparatus OR Devices Specially Adapted FOR Metallic Powder 7

G03G - ELECTROGRAPHY; ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHY; Magnetography 6

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 6

B29B - Preparation OR Pretreatment OF THE Material TO BE SHAPED; Making Granules OR PREFORMS; Recovery OF Plastics OR Other Constituents OF Waste Material Containing Plastics 6

C22C - Alloys 5

B65H - Handling Thin OR Filamentary Material, e.g. Sheets, Webs, Cables 4

B29L - Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclass B29c, Relating TO Particular Articles 2

G05B - Control OR Regulating Systems IN GENERAL; Functional Elements OF Such SYSTEMS; Monitoring OR Testing Arrangements FOR Such Systems OR Elements 2

B23Q - Details, Components, OR Accessories FOR Machine Tools, e.g. Arrangements FOR Copying OR Controlling ; Machine Tools IN General Characterised BY THE Construction OF Particular Details OR COMPONENTS; Combinations OR Associations OF Metal-working Machines, NOT Directed TO A Particular Result 1

C08J - WORKING-UP; General Processes OF COMPOUNDING; After-treatment NOT Covered BY Subclasses C08b, C08c, C08f, C08g or C08h 1

Top 15 of 21 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Impossible Objects, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Impossible Objects, Inc.'s lead technology class is B33Y (Additive Manufacturing, i.e. Manufacturing OF Three-dimensional [3-D] Objects BY Additive Deposition, Additive Agglomeration OR Additive Layering, e.g. BY 3-D Printing, Stereolithography OR Selective ), 94.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B33Y
Ranked #9,054 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Impossible Objects, Inc. against Innovia Films Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 47.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.