Overall rank by patents
#26,573
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 10 granted patents across 4 technology areas, active 2017–2022. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: A61M (DEVICES FOR INTRODUCING MEDIA INTO, OR ONTO, THE BODY ; DEVICES FOR TRANSDUCING BODY MEDIA OR FOR TAKING MEDIA FROM THE BODY ; DEVICES FOR PRODUCING OR ENDING SLEEP OR STUPOR).
The verdict
Impel holds 10 US patents across 4 technology areas, rank #26,573 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Impel Neuropharma, Inc. has been granted 10 US utility patents between 2017 and 2022, placing Impel Neuropharma, Inc. at rank #26,573 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 4 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 21.2 claims per patent with primary concentration in A61M (DEVICES FOR INTRODUCING MEDIA INTO, OR ONTO, THE BODY ; DEVICES FOR TRANSDUCING BODY MEDIA OR FOR TAKING MEDIA FROM THE BODY ; DEVICES FOR PRODUCING OR ENDING SLEEP OR STUPOR). As a US Corporation, Impel Neuropharma, Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Impel sits between Identy Inc. (10 patents, rank #26,569) and Incoe Corporation (10 patents, rank #26,577) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 30.3/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 7 grants, compared with 3 in the 2015–2019 window, a +133% shift in five-year velocity. An acceleration of this magnitude signals aggressive R&D investment and expanding technical ambition. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Impel Neuropharma, Inc.'s 21.2 average claims per patent reflects complex, broadly scoped inventions that are difficult for competitors to design around, while specialization in 4 subclasses reflects a tightly scoped invention area. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Impel Neuropharma, Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Identy Inc.
10 patents
Illumigyn Ltd.
10 patents
ImaginAb, Inc.
10 patents
Immersive Robotics Pty Ltd
10 patents
Impel Pharmaceuticals Inc.
10 patents
Inca Digital Printers Limited
10 patents
Incisive Surgical, Inc.
10 patents
Incoe Corporation
10 patents
Impel Neuropharma, Inc.
10 patents
What this shows Impel holds 10 patents at rank #26,573, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Impel's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
30 Top 66% higher than 34% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2018 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2019 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2020 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2021 | 4 | 40.0% |
| 2022 | 2 | 20.0% |
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#26,573
Across all tracked assignees
30.3 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Impel's 10 grants land it in the top 66% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.