USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Impact Weapons Components, LLC

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 19 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2022. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Impact ranks #15,365 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 19 patents across 0 technology areas.

#15,365
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
4th percentile
by Innovation Score (17.6/100)
1.0
avg claims per patent
-73%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R15365 · US Corporation #15,365 · 19 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-RICH

  • GRANTS-MICRO 19 grants
  • MID-PACK #15,365/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Icera
  • CPC-UNK CPC blank
  • INNOV-LOW 17.6/100
  • CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DROP -73% vel
  • BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Icera, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Impact’s 17.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Impact

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Impact's Innovation Score is 17.6/100 (4th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Impact?

Each dot is one of Impact’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Impact’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 16.9 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Impact vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 18.918.91919.1 0510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Iview Displays (SHENZHEN) Company Ltd. - 19, 13.21Iview Displays (S…Icera, Inc. - 19, 17.05IceraIlika Technologies Ltd - 19, 20.05IlikaImmanuel Industrial Co., Ltd. - 19, 1Immanuel Industri…Impedimed Limited - 19, 21.21ImpedimedInductEV Inc. - 19, 20.26InductevIneda Systems Pvt. Ltd - 19, 16.95Ineda Systems PvtInner Mongolia University of Technology - 19, 8.26Inner Mongolia Un…Impact Weapons Components, LLC - 19, 1Impact Weapons Co…
Impact vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Impact's grants concentrate

Impact Weapons Components, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2016 (8 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Impact sits between Iview Displays (SHENZHEN) Company Ltd. and Inner Mongolia University of Technology.

Impact's three-year grant acceleration

Impact Weapons Components, LLC shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Impact's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Impact holds 19 patents at rank #15,376, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Impact

By rank, the assignees closest to #15,376 in granted patent volume.

Impact's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

18 4th percentile higher than 4% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0246810 2015201620172018202020212022 2
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2022

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Impact Weapons Components, LLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 3 15.8%
2016 8 42.1%
2017 3 15.8%
2018 1 5.3%
2020 1 5.3%
2021 1 5.3%
2022 2 10.5%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Impact Weapons Components, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Ranked #15,365 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Impact Weapons Components, LLC against Iview Displays (SHENZHEN) Company Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 17.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.