Imagine Optic
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G02B (Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Imagine ranks #32,013 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 7 technology areas.
- #32,013
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 39%
- by Innovation Score (39.0/100)
- 14.6
- avg claims per patent
- -25%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R32013 · Foreign Corporation #32,013 · 8 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
- MID-PACK #32,013/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Igor
- CPC-NARROW G02B · 7 areas
- INNOV-THIN 39.0/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 14.6 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DOWN -25% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Igor, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Imagine’s 39.0 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Imagine
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Imagine Optic · this assignee
Imagine Optic · this assignee
39 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Imagine's Innovation Score is 39.0/100 (top 39% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Imagine?
Each dot is one of Imagine’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Imagine’s own 14.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 12.5 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Imagine's grants concentrate
Imagine Optic is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 87.5% of grants classified under G02B (Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Imagine sits between Igor, Inc. and Immunicum AB.
Imagine's three-year grant acceleration
Imagine Optic shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Imagine's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Igor
Igor, Inc.
8 patents
- IH IP Holdings
IH IP Holdings Limited
8 patents
- Ikin
Ikin, Inc.
8 patents
- IllycaffÈ S P A C…
ILLYCAFFÈ S.P.A. CON Unico Socio
8 patents
- Imberatek
Imberatek, LLC
8 patents
- IMC Toys
IMC Toys, S.A.
8 patents
- Imdss Solutions
Imdss Solutions LLC
8 patents
- Immunicum AB
Immunicum AB
8 patents
- Imagine Optic ◀
Imagine Optic
8 patents
What this shows Imagine holds 8 patents at rank #31,996, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Imagine
By rank, the assignees closest to #31,996 in granted patent volume.
- Igor, Inc. #31,992 · 8 patents
- IH IP Holdings Limited #31,993 · 8 patents
- Ikin, Inc. #31,994 · 8 patents
- ILLYCAFFÈ S.P.A. CON Unico Socio #31,995 · 8 patents
- Imberatek, LLC #31,997 · 8 patents
- IMC Toys, S.A. #31,998 · 8 patents
- Imdss Solutions LLC #31,999 · 8 patents
- Immunicum AB #32,000 · 8 patents
Leaders in G02B (Optical Elements)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Imagine's primary technology class.
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 4,608 in class
- Canon Kabushiki Kaisha 2,525 in class
- Fujifilm Corporation 2,173 in class
- BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. 1,899 in class
- Olympus Corporation 1,893 in class
- Sony Group Corporation 1,572 in class
- Apple Inc. 1,367 in class
- Seiko Epson Corporation 1,332 in class
Imagine's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
39 Top 39% higher than 61% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2016 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2018 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2021 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2023 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2024 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 12.5% |
Which technologies does Imagine Optic patent most?
Top 7 of 7 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Imagine Optic's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Imagine Optic's lead technology class is G02B (Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus), 87.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G02B
- Ranked #32,013 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Imagine Optic against Igor, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 39.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.